EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Owen O'Neill
dblp:07/3843
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
generative model safety |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | A Guardrail Framework for Sensitive Financial Information Protection: A Taxonomy-Driven Approach · AAAI 2026 |
Privacy and data protection
sensitive information detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | A Guardrail Framework for Sensitive Financial Information Protection: A Taxonomy-Driven Approach · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
taxonomy construction · 2.0synthetic dataset generation · 2.0generative adversarial network · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | A Guardrail Framework for Sensitive Financial Information Protection: A Taxonomy-Driven ApproachabstractThe increasing adoption of large language models in the fi-nancial sector introduces significant challenges related to the handling of sensitive financial information (SFI). Existing general-purpose content safety solutions, or guardrails, often fall short in detecting domain-specific risks inherent in finan-cial data processing. This study addresses these gaps by de-veloping a comprehensive taxonomy of SFI, grounded in globally recognized financial, information security, and AI governance standards. Leveraging this taxonomy, we synthe-sized an extensive dataset encompassing diverse categories of SFI and trained GARD (Generative Adversarial network Risk Detection) model to detect sensitive content in both in-puts and outputs of GenAI systems within the financial do-main. Our evaluation compared GARD against commercial guardrail solutions, including the OpenAI Moderation API and Microsoft Azure Content Safety (ACS). The results demonstrated that while commercial solutions maintained high precision, their recall was substantially lower, indicating many risky instances went undetected. In contrast, our model achieved a recall score of 0.98, significantly outperforming the benchmarks and enhancing SFI detection. These findings underscore the necessity of domain-specific guardrails tai-lored to the financial sector to ensure robust AI safety and compliance. In conclusion, this work contributes (1) A de-tailed taxonomy of SFI tailored for GenAI applications, (2) A comprehensive synthetic dataset that encompasses a wide range of sensitive topics relevant to the domain and (3) A high-performance risk detection model that can be deployed independently or alongside existing solutions to improve con-tent safety in financial services. This approach promotes trust, mitigates financial, legal, and reputational risks, and supports the responsible adoption of GenAI technologies in sensitive domains. Mehdi Yekrangi, Houssem Chatbri, Claudia Beatrice Chianella, Owen O'Neill |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2009 | The track repulsion effect in automatic tracking
Stefano Coraluppi, Craig Carthel, Peter Willett 0001, Maxence Dingboe, Owen O'Neill, Tod Luginbuhl |
FUSION | 5 |
| 2006 | Conformance Testing, the Elixer within the Chain for Learning Scenarios and ObjectsabstractThe chain for learning scenarios(LSs) and learning objects(LOs) comprises five iterative links: (i) development, (ii) publication, (iii) making resources searchable (iv) facilitating their arrangement (v) towards a runnable unit of learning. E-learning specifications and components-based systems embedded in a service-oriented architecture are conditio sine qua non for enabling this chain. To create a stronger more enduring chain, it must be easier to develop software and content compliant to elearning specifications. Conformance Testing (CT) is the elixir within the chain for LSs and LOs and the Telcert project CT system can be used in strengthening the chain. Rob Nadolski, Owen O'Neill, Wim van der Vegt, Rob Koper |
ICALT | 2 |