Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Roger G. Fordham

dblp:07/3877 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 56% Requirements engineering and software design · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
software process		 0.011999
Software Process Maturity: Is Level five Enough? · ICSE 1999
Software maintenance and evolution › software process improvement
software process maturity		 0.011999
Software Process Maturity: Is Level five Enough? · ICSE 1999
Software maintenance and evolution › software process improvement
capability maturity model		 0.011999
Software Process Maturity: Is Level five Enough? · ICSE 1999
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Keynote Address: Software Development Challenges for the 2000's
Roger G. Fordham
 PROFES1
1999 Software Process Maturity: Is Level five Enough?
abstract
No abstract available.
Roger G. Fordham
 ICSE1