Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Zerling
dblp:07/3893
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1985
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 67% Algorithms and data structures · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithms and data structures › combinatorial algorithms › enumeration algorithms
binary tree generation |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | Generating Binary Trees Using Rotations · J. ACM 1985 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › enumeration
combinatorial generation |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | Generating Binary Trees Using Rotations · J. ACM 1985 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › enumeration
lattice paths |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | Generating Binary Trees Using Rotations · J. ACM 1985 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rotation · 0.0lexicographic generation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1985 | Generating Binary Trees Using RotationsabstractA new algorithm that, for the first time, exploits the rotational geometry of binary trees is developed in order to allow for the lexicographic generation of computer representations of these trees in average time O (1) per tree. “Rotation” codewords for these trees (in average time O (1) per tree) are also generated. It is shown how these codewords relate to lattice paths, and, using this relationship, that n ( n - 1)/( n + 2) is the average number of rotations needed to generate a binary tree on n nodes. Finally, a necessary and sufficient condition that a codeword represent a full binary tree (each node has 0 or 2 sons) on n = 2 m + 1 nodes is given and how to contract this codeword to obtain the codeword for the binary tree on m nodes for which this full tree is the extended binary tree is shown. David Zerling |
J. ACM | 1 |