Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Zerling

dblp:07/3893 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1985
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 67% Algorithms and data structures · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › combinatorial algorithms › enumeration algorithms
binary tree generation
0.011985
Generating Binary Trees Using Rotations · J. ACM 1985
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › enumeration
combinatorial generation
0.011985
Generating Binary Trees Using Rotations · J. ACM 1985
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › enumeration
lattice paths
0.011985
Generating Binary Trees Using Rotations · J. ACM 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rotation · 0.0lexicographic generation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1985 Generating Binary Trees Using Rotations
abstract
A new algorithm that, for the first time, exploits the rotational geometry of binary trees is developed in order to allow for the lexicographic generation of computer representations of these trees in average time O (1) per tree. “Rotation” codewords for these trees (in average time O (1) per tree) are also generated. It is shown how these codewords relate to lattice paths, and, using this relationship, that n ( n - 1)/( n + 2) is the average number of rotations needed to generate a binary tree on n nodes. Finally, a necessary and sufficient condition that a codeword represent a full binary tree (each node has 0 or 2 sons) on n = 2 m + 1 nodes is given and how to contract this codeword to obtain the codeword for the binary tree on m nodes for which this full tree is the extended binary tree is shown.
David Zerling
J. ACM1