Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kathleen Wilson
dblp:07/5862
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Learning and educational technologies · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical and health informatics
cytogenetics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Automated classification of cytogenetic abnormalities in hematolymphoid neoplasms · Bioinform. 2022 |
Medical and health informatics
clinical genomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Automated classification of cytogenetic abnormalities in hematolymphoid neoplasms · Bioinform. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient class activation maps · 0.6cyclical learning rates · 0.6convolutional neural network · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Automated classification of cytogenetic abnormalities in hematolymphoid neoplasmsabstractMOTIVATION: Algorithms for classifying chromosomes, like convolutional deep neural networks (CNNs), show promise to augment cytogeneticists' workflows; however, a critical limitation is their inability to accurately classify various structural chromosomal abnormalities. In hematopathology, recurrent structural cytogenetic abnormalities herald diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications, but are laborious for expert cytogeneticists to identify. Non-recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities also occur frequently cancerous cells. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of using CNNs to accurately classify many recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities while being able to reliably detect non-recurrent, spurious abnormal chromosomes, as well as provide insights into dataset assembly, model selection and training methodology that improve overall generalizability and performance for chromosome classification. RESULTS: Our top-performing model achieved a mean weighted F1 score of 96.86% on the validation set and 94.03% on the test set. Gradient class activation maps indicated that our model learned biologically meaningful feature maps, reinforcing the clinical utility of our proposed approach. Altogether, this work: proposes a new dataset framework for training chromosome classifiers for use in a clinical environment, reveals that residual CNNs and cyclical learning rates confer superior performance, and demonstrates the feasibility of using this approach to automatically screen for many recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities while adeptly classifying non-recurrent abnormal chromosomes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software is freely available at https://github.com/DaehwanKimLab/Chromosome-ReAd. The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to it being protected patient information. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Chanhee Park, Prasad Koduru, Kathleen Wilson, Olga Weinberg, Weina Chen, Rolando García |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 1993 | AI Multimedia and Education
Roger C. Schank, Glorianna Davenport, P. Ghislandi, Jim Spohrer, Kathleen Wilson |
IJCAI | 5 |
| 1969 | Design and testing of the System 4 random number generatorabstractThe design of the System 4 random number generator is described, and test results given. No particular originality is claimed, but a few conclusions by previous authors are commented on. J. D. Beasley, Kathleen Wilson |
Comput. J. | 2 |