Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John E. Stockenberg

dblp:07/6195 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › performance prediction
software performance prediction
0.011975
STRUCT Programming Analysis System · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hierarchical software analysis · 0.0graphics-based program visualization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1993 A Dynamic Integration Architecture for High Availability Real-Time Systems
abstract
Describes a software architecture which supports incremental system and software integration, hardware and software maintenance, and system evolution and reconfiguration without imposing a significant impact on system performance or availability. The approach utilizes a compact command language for controlling the dynamic integration of new or replacement software and hardware components into a distributed real-time system while that system is operating normally. The approach works with current languages, architectures and applications and does not depend on the availability of redundant processing components. The dynamic integration command language is described using a typical usage scenario, and the results of a prototype implementation effort are discussed, in which real-time dynamic integration commands have been shown to have performance times in the 20-30-/spl mu/s range.>
John E. Stockenberg
ICSM1
1975 STRUCT Programming Analysis System
abstract
The STRUCT system utilizes the flexibility of a powerful graphics display system to provide a set of tools for program analysis. These tools allow the analysis of the static program structure and the dynamic execution behaviour of programs within the entire operating system user program environment of the Brown University Graphics System (BUGS). Information is collected and presented in a manner which fully exploits two aspects of this environment. First, the operating system has been developed in a well-structured hierarchical manner following principles laid down by other researchers. Second the programs under analysis have been written in a structured programming language following coding conventions which make available, at the source code level, valuable program control information. This system is currently being used to predict and analyze the performance advantages available through the migration of function between levels of software and between software and firmware within the BUGS.
John E. Stockenberg, Andries van Dam
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1