Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carolyn Brodie

dblp:07/6892 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 9 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
User interface design and tools · 59% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 41%
Network and information security
3 papers
Privacy and data protection · 88% Usable security · 12%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › privacy policy
privacy policy specification
0.112006
Evaluating interfaces for privacy policy rule authoring · CHI 2006
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
privacy and security
0.112005
Why HCI research in privacy and security is critical now · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2005
Privacy and data protection › privacy policy
privacy policy management
0.112005
Privacy in information technology: Designing to enable privacy policy management in organizations · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2005
User interface design and tools
privacy design
0.012005
Privacy in information technology: Designing to enable privacy policy management in organizations · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2005
Usable security
usable privacy
0.012005
Why HCI research in privacy and security is critical now · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical study · 0.1controlled experiment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Privacy-aware role-based access control
abstract
In this article, we introduce a comprehensive framework supporting a privacy-aware access control mechanism, that is, a mechanism tailored to enforce access control to data containing personally identifiable information and, as such, privacy sensitive. The key component of the framework is a family of models (P-RBAC) that extend the well-known RBAC model in order to provide full support for expressing highly complex privacy-related policies, taking into account features like purposes and obligations. We formally define the notion of privacy-aware permissions and the notion of conflicting permission assignments in P-RBAC, together with efficient conflict-checking algorithms. The framework also includes a flexible authoring tool, based on the use of the SPARCLE system, supporting the high-level specification of P-RBAC permissions. SPARCLE supports the use of natural language for authoring policies and is able to automatically generate P-RBAC permissions from these natural language specifications. In the article, we also report performance evaluation results and contrast our approach with other relevant access control and privacy policy frameworks such as P3P, EPAL, and XACML.
Qun Ni, Elisa Bertino, Jorge Lobo 0001, Carolyn Brodie, Clare-Marie Karat, John Karat, Alberto Trombetta
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur.4
2008 Evaluating assistance of natural language policy authoring
abstract
The goal of the research study reported here was to investigate policy authors' ability to take descriptions of changes to policy situations and author high-quality, complete policy rules that would parse with high accuracy. As a part of this research, we investigated ways in which we could assist policy authors in writing policies. This paper presents the results of a user study on the effectiveness of providing syntax highlighting in a natural language policy authoring interface. While subjects liked the new interface, they showed no improvement in accuracy when writing rules. We discuss our results in terms of a three phase authoring process that users move through when authoring or modifying policies. We describe this process, discuss why and how our interface failed to support it and make recommendations to designers on how to better support this process.
Kami Vaniea, Clare-Marie Karat, Joshua B. Gross, John Karat, Carolyn Brodie
SOUPS5
2007 Usability Challenges in Security and Privacy Policy-Authoring Interfaces
Robert W. Reeder, Clare-Marie Karat, John Karat, Carolyn Brodie
INTERACT (2)4
2006 Evaluating interfaces for privacy policy rule authoring
abstract
Privacy policy rules are often written in organizations by a team of people in different roles. Currently, people in these roles have no technological tools to guide the creation of clear and implementable high-quality privacy policy rules. High-quality privacy rules can be the basis for verifiable automated privacy access decisions. An empirical study was conducted with 36 users who were novices in privacy policy authoring to evaluate the quality of rules created and user satisfaction with two experimental privacy authoring tools and a control condition. Results show that users presented with scenarios were able to author significantly higher quality rules using either the natural language with a privacy rule guide tool or a structured list tool as compared to an unguided natural language control condition. The significant differences in quality were found in both user self-ratings of rule quality and objective quality scores. Users ranked the two experimental tools significantly higher than the control condition. Implications of the research and future research directions are discussed.
Clare-Marie Karat, John Karat, Carolyn Brodie, Jinjuan Feng
CHI3
2006 An empirical study of natural language parsing of privacy policy rules using the SPARCLE policy workbench
abstract
Today organizations do not have good ways of linking their written privacy policies with the implementation of those policies. To assist organizations in addressing this issue, our humancentered research has focused on understanding organizational privacy management needs, and, based on those needs, creating a usable and effective policy workbench called SPARCLE. SPARCLE will enable organizational users to enter policies in natural language, parse the policies to identify policy elements and then generate a machine readable (XML) version of the policy. In the future, SPARCLE will then enable mapping of policies to the organization’s configuration and provide audit and compliance tools to ensure that the policy implementation operates as intended. In this paper, we present the strategies employed in the design and implementation of the natural
Carolyn Brodie, Clare-Marie Karat, John Karat
SOUPS1
2005 Designing Natural Language and Structured Entry Methods for Privacy Policy Authoring
John Karat, Clare-Marie Karat, Carolyn Brodie, Jinjuan Feng
INTERACT3
2005 Usable security and privacy: a case study of developing privacy management tools
abstract
Privacy is a concept which received relatively little attention during the rapid growth and spread of information technology through the 1980's and 1990's. Design to make information easily accessible, without particular attention to issues such as whether an individual had a desire or right to control access to and use of particular information was seen as the more pressing goal. We believe that there will be an increasing awareness of a fundamental need to address privacy concerns in information technology, and that doing so will require an understanding of policies that govern information use as well as the development of technologies that can implement such policies. The research reported here describes our efforts to design a privacy management workbench which facilitates privacy policy authoring, implementation, and compliance monitoring. This case study highlights the work of identifying organizational privacy requirements, analyzing existing technology, on-going research to identify approaches that address these requirements, and iteratively designing and validating a prototype with target users for flexible privacy technologies.
Carolyn Brodie, Clare-Marie Karat, John Karat, Jinjuan Feng
SOUPS1
2005 Why HCI research in privacy and security is critical now
Clare-Marie Karat, John Karat, Carolyn Brodie
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.3
2005 Privacy in information technology: Designing to enable privacy policy management in organizations
John Karat, Clare-Marie Karat, Carolyn Brodie, Jinjuan Feng
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.3
2003 User Attitudes Regarding a User-Adaptive eCommerce Web Site
Sherman R. Alpert, John Karat, Clare-Marie Karat, Carolyn Brodie, John Vergo
User Model. User Adapt. Interact.4