Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kirk A. Bradley
dblp:07/6899
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Routing and switching · 77% Network management and operations · 23% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Network security · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Routing and switching › routing
secure routing |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Detecting Disruptive Routers: A Distributed Network Monitoring Approach · S&P 1998 |
Network security › network measurement
network monitoring |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Detecting Disruptive Routers: A Distributed Network Monitoring Approach · S&P 1998 |
Network management and operations › fault management
fault diagnosis |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Detecting Disruptive Routers: A Distributed Network Monitoring Approach · S&P 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
conservation of flow · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Detecting Disruptive Routers: A Distributed Network Monitoring ApproachabstractAn attractive target for a computer system attacker is the router. An attacker in control of a router can disrupt communication by dropping or misrouting packets passing through the router. We present a protocol called WATCHERS that detects and reacts to routers that drop or misroute packets. WATCHERS is based on the principle of conservation of flow in a network: all data bytes sent into a node, and not destined for that node, are expected to exit the node. WATCHERS tracks this flow, and detects routers that violate the conservation principle. We show that WATCHERS has several advantages over existing network monitoring techniques. We argue that WATCHERS' impact on router performance and WATCHERS' memory requirements are reasonable for many environments. We demonstrate that in ideal conditions WATCHERS makes no false-positive diagnoses. We also describe how WATCHERS can be tuned to perform nearly as well in realistic conditions. Kirk A. Bradley, Steven Cheung, Nicholas J. Puketza, Biswanath Mukherjee, Ronald A. Olsson |
S&P | 1 |