Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Charles E. Grant
dblp:07/7244
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
6 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene regulation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | T-Gene: improved target gene prediction · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › transcription factor analysis
transcription factor target prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | T-Gene: improved target gene prediction · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | MoMo: discovery of statistically significant post-translational modification motifs · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
gene regulation analysis |
0.3 | 2 | 2016 | MCAST: scanning for cis-regulatory motif clusters · Bioinform. 2016 Assessing phylogenetic motif models for predicting transcription factor binding sites · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › regulatory element discovery
cis-regulatory module prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | MCAST: scanning for cis-regulatory motif clusters · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | Improved similarity scores for comparing motifs · Bioinform. 2011 FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence motif analysis
motif scanning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence motif analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding site prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Assessing phylogenetic motif models for predicting transcription factor binding sites · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multi-omics data integration
epigenomic data integration |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | MCAST: scanning for cis-regulatory motif clusters · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
motif discovery |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Improved similarity scores for comparing motifs · Bioinform. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
histone modification correlation · 0.4expression correlation · 0.4distance-based scoring · 0.4statistical confidence estimation · 0.4hidden markov model · 0.2false discovery rate estimation · 0.2log-likelihood ratio scoring · 0.1false discovery rate analysis · 0.1dynamic programming · 0.1bayesian information criterion · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | T-Gene: improved target gene predictionabstractMOTIVATION: Identifying the genes regulated by a given transcription factor (TF) (its 'target genes') is a key step in developing a comprehensive understanding of gene regulation. Previously, we developed a method (CisMapper) for predicting the target genes of a TF based solely on the correlation between a histone modification at the TF's binding site and the expression of the gene across a set of tissues or cell lines. That approach is limited to organisms for which extensive histone and expression data are available, and does not explicitly incorporate the genomic distance between the TF and the gene. RESULTS: We present the T-Gene algorithm, which overcomes these limitations. It can be used to predict which genes are most likely to be regulated by a TF, and which of the TF's binding sites are most likely involved in regulating particular genes. T-Gene calculates a novel score that combines distance and histone/expression correlation, and we show that this score accurately predicts when a regulatory element bound by a TF is in contact with a gene's promoter, achieving median precision above 60%. T-Gene is easy to use via its web server or as a command-line tool, and can also make accurate predictions (median precision above 40%) based on distance alone when extensive histone/expression data is not available for the organism. T-Gene provides an estimate of the statistical significance of each of its predictions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The T-Gene web server, source code, histone/expression data and genome annotation files are provided at http://meme-suite.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Timothy O'Connor, Charles E. Grant, Mikael Bodén, Timothy L. Bailey |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2019 | MoMo: discovery of statistically significant post-translational modification motifsabstractMOTIVATION: Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of proteins are associated with many significant biological functions and can be identified in high throughput using tandem mass spectrometry. Many PTMs are associated with short sequence patterns called 'motifs' that help localize the modifying enzyme. Accordingly, many algorithms have been designed to identify these motifs from mass spectrometry data. Accurate statistical confidence estimates for discovered motifs are critically important for proper interpretation and in the design of downstream experimental validation. RESULTS: We describe a method for assigning statistical confidence estimates to PTM motifs, and we demonstrate that this method provides accurate P-values on both simulated and real data. Our methods are implemented in MoMo, a software tool for discovering motifs among sets of PTMs that we make available as a web server and as downloadable source code. MoMo re-implements the two most widely used PTM motif discovery algorithms-motif-x and MoDL-while offering many enhancements. Relative to motif-x, MoMo offers improved statistical confidence estimates and more accurate calculation of motif scores. The MoMo web server offers more proteome databases, more input formats, larger inputs and longer running times than the motif-x web server. Finally, our study demonstrates that the confidence estimates produced by motif-x are inaccurate. This inaccuracy stems in part from the common practice of drawing 'background' peptides from an unshuffled proteome database. Our results thus suggest that many of the papers that use motif-x to find motifs may be reporting results that lack statistical support. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The MoMo web server and source code are provided at http://meme-suite.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Alice Cheng, Charles E. Grant, William Stafford Noble, Timothy L. Bailey |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2016 | MCAST: scanning for cis-regulatory motif clustersabstractUNLABELLED: Precise regulatory control of genes, particularly in eukaryotes, frequently requires the joint action of multiple sequence-specific transcription factors. A cis-regulatory module (CRM) is a genomic locus that is responsible for gene regulation and that contains multiple transcription factor binding sites in close proximity. Given a collection of known transcription factor binding motifs, many bioinformatics methods have been proposed over the past 15 years for identifying within a genomic sequence candidate CRMs consisting of clusters of those motifs. RESULTS: The MCAST algorithm uses a hidden Markov model with a P-value-based scoring scheme to identify candidate CRMs. Here, we introduce a new version of MCAST that offers improved graphical output, a dynamic background model, statistical confidence estimates based on false discovery rate estimation and, most significantly, the ability to predict CRMs while taking into account epigenomic data such as DNase I sensitivity or histone modification data. We demonstrate the validity of MCAST's statistical confidence estimates and the utility of epigenomic priors in identifying CRMs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MCAST is part of the MEME Suite software toolkit. A web server and source code are available at http://meme-suite.org and http://alternate.meme-suite.org CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Charles E. Grant, Timothy L. Bailey, William Stafford Noble |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2011 | FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motifabstractUNLABELLED: A motif is a short DNA or protein sequence that contributes to the biological function of the sequence in which it resides. Over the past several decades, many computational methods have been described for identifying, characterizing and searching with sequence motifs. Critical to nearly any motif-based sequence analysis pipeline is the ability to scan a sequence database for occurrences of a given motif described by a position-specific frequency matrix. RESULTS: We describe Find Individual Motif Occurrences (FIMO), a software tool for scanning DNA or protein sequences with motifs described as position-specific scoring matrices. The program computes a log-likelihood ratio score for each position in a given sequence database, uses established dynamic programming methods to convert this score to a P-value and then applies false discovery rate analysis to estimate a q-value for each position in the given sequence. FIMO provides output in a variety of formats, including HTML, XML and several Santa Cruz Genome Browser formats. The program is efficient, allowing for the scanning of DNA sequences at a rate of 3.5 Mb/s on a single CPU. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: FIMO is part of the MEME Suite software toolkit. A web server and source code are available at http://meme.sdsc.edu. Charles E. Grant, Timothy L. Bailey, William Stafford Noble |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2011 | Improved similarity scores for comparing motifsabstractMOTIVATION: A question that often comes up after applying a motif finder to a set of co-regulated DNA sequences is whether the reported putative motif is similar to any known motif. While several tools have been designed for this task, Habib et al. pointed out that the scores that are commonly used for measuring similarity between motifs do not distinguish between a good alignment of two informative columns (say, all-A) and one of two uninformative columns. This observation explains why tools such as Tomtom occasionally return an alignment of uninformative columns which is clearly spurious. To address this problem, Habib et al. suggested a new score [Bayesian Likelihood 2-Component (BLiC)] which uses a Bayesian information criterion to penalize matches that are also similar to the background distribution. RESULTS: We show that the BLiC score exhibits other, highly undesirable properties, and we offer instead a general approach to adjust any motif similarity score so as to reduce the number of reported spurious alignments of uninformative columns. We implement our method in Tomtom and show that, without significantly compromising Tomtom's retrieval accuracy or its runtime, we can drastically reduce the number of uninformative alignments. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The modified Tomtom is available as part of the MEME Suite at http://meme.nbcr.net. Emi Tanaka, Timothy L. Bailey, Charles E. Grant, William Stafford Noble, Uri Keich |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2009 | Assessing phylogenetic motif models for predicting transcription factor binding sitesabstractMOTIVATION: A variety of algorithms have been developed to predict transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) within the genome by exploiting the evolutionary information implicit in multiple alignments of the genomes of related species. One such approach uses an extension of the standard position-specific motif model that incorporates phylogenetic information via a phylogenetic tree and a model of evolution. However, these phylogenetic motif models (PMMs) have never been rigorously benchmarked in order to determine whether they lead to better prediction of TFBSs than obtained using simple position weight matrix scanning. RESULTS: We evaluate three PMM-based prediction algorithms, each of which uses a different treatment of gapped alignments, and we compare their prediction accuracy with that of a non-phylogenetic motif scanning approach. Surprisingly, all of these algorithms appear to be inferior to simple motif scanning, when accuracy is measured using a gold standard of validated yeast TFBSs. However, the PMM scanners perform much better than simple motif scanning when we abandon the gold standard and consider the number of statistically significant sites predicted, using column-shuffled 'random' motifs to measure significance. These results suggest that the common practice of measuring the accuracy of binding site predictors using collections of known sites may be dangerously misleading since such collections may be missing 'weak' sites, which are exactly the type of sites needed to discriminate among predictors. We then extend our previous theoretical model of the statistical power of PMM-based prediction algorithms to allow for loss of binding sites during evolution, and show that it gives a more accurate upper bound on scanner accuracy. Finally, utilizing our theoretical model, we introduce a new method for predicting the number of real binding sites in a genome. The results suggest that the number of true sites for a yeast TF is in general several times greater than the number of known sites listed in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Database (SCPD). Among the three scanning algorithms that we test, the MONKEY algorithm has the highest accuracy for predicting yeast TFBSs. John Hawkins, Charles E. Grant, William Stafford Noble, Timothy L. Bailey |
Bioinform. | 2 |