Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sue Zheng
dblp:07/7566
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 38% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 38% Information theory · 23% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% Reinforcement learning · 33% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
resource allocation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sequential Bayesian Experimental Design with Variable Cost Structure · NeurIPS 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty › information gathering › informative planning
information-theoretic planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Robust Approach to Sequential Information Theoretic Planning · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › mutual information
mutual information estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Robust Approach to Sequential Information Theoretic Planning · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sequential experimental design |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Robust Approach to Sequential Information Theoretic Planning · ICML 2018 |
Information theory › information measures
mutual information |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Sequential Bayesian Experimental Design with Variable Cost Structure · NeurIPS 2020 |
Information theory › information measures › mutual information
mutual information bound |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Sequential Bayesian Experimental Design with Variable Cost Structure · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
two-sided bounds · 0.4knapsack optimization · 0.4best-arm identification · 0.4robust m-estimator · 0.3particle filtering · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Fast Variational Estimation of Mutual Information for Implicit and Explicit Likelihood ModelsabstractComputing mutual information (MI) of random variables lacks a closed-form in nontrivial models. Variational MI approximations are widely used as flexible estimators for this purpose, but computing them typically requires solving a costly nonconvex optimization. We prove that a widely used class of variational MI estimators can be solved via moment matching operations in place of the numerical optimization methods that are typically required. We show that the same moment matching solution yields variational estimates for so-called “implicit” models that lack a closed form likelihood function. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this moment matching solution has multiple orders of magnitude computational speed up compared to the standard optimization based solutions. We show that theoretical results are supported by numerical evaluation in fully parameterized Gaussian mixture models and a generalized linear model with implicit likelihood due to nuisance variables. We also demonstrate on the implicit simulation-based likelihood SIR epidemiology model, where we avoid costly likelihood free inference and observe many orders of magnitude speedup. Caleb Dahlke, Sue Zheng, Jason L. Pacheco |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2020 | Sequential Bayesian Experimental Design with Variable Cost StructureabstractMutual information (MI) is a commonly adopted utility function in Bayesian optimal experimental design (BOED). While theoretically appealing, MI evaluation poses a significant computational burden for most real world applications. As a result, many algorithms utilize MI bounds as proxies that lack regret-style guarantees. Here, we utilize two-sided bounds to provide such guarantees. Bounds are successively refined/tightened through additional computation until a desired guarantee is achieved. We consider the problem of adaptively allocating computational resources in BOED. Our approach achieves the same guarantee as existing methods, but with fewer evaluations of the costly MI reward. We adapt knapsack optimization of best arm identification problems, with important differences that impact overall algorithm design and performance. First, observations of MI rewards are biased. Second, evaluating experiments incurs shared costs amongst all experiments (posterior sampling) in addition to per experiment costs that may vary with increasing evaluation. We propose and demonstrate an algorithm that accounts for these variable costs in the refinement decision. Sue Zheng, David S. Hayden, Jason L. Pacheco, John W. Fisher III |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | A Robust Approach to Sequential Information Theoretic PlanningabstractIn many sequential planning applications a natural approach to generating high quality plans is to maximize an information reward such as mutual information (MI). Unfortunately, MI lacks a closed form in all but trivial models, and so must be estimated. In applications where the cost of plan execution is expensive, one desires planning estimates which admit theoretical guarantees. Through the use of robust M-estimators we obtain bounds on absolute deviation of estimated MI. Moreover, we propose a sequential algorithm which integrates inference and planning by maximally reusing particles in each stage. We validate the utility of using robust estimators in the sequential approach on a Gaussian Markov Random Field wherein information measures have a closed form. Lastly, we demonstrate the benefits of our integrated approach in the context of sequential experiment design for inferring causal regulatory networks from gene expression levels. Our method shows improvements over a recent method which selects intervention experiments based on the same MI objective. Sue Zheng, Jason L. Pacheco, John W. Fisher III |
ICML | 1 |
| 2014 | Bayesian nonparametric modeling of driver behaviorabstractModern vehicles are equipped with increasingly complex sensors. These sensors generate large volumes of data that provide opportunities for modeling and analysis. Here, we are interested in exploiting this data to learn aspects of behaviors and the road network associated with individual drivers. Our dataset is collected on a standard vehicle used to commute to work and for personal trips. A Hidden Markov Model (HMM) trained on the GPS position and orientation data is utilized to compress the large amount of position information into a small amount of road segment states. Each state has a set of observations, i.e. car signals, associated with it that are quantized and modeled as draws from a Hierarchical Dirichlet Process (HDP). The inference for the topic distributions is carried out using an online variational inference algorithm. The topic distributions over joint quantized car signals characterize the driving situation in the respective road state. In a novel manner, we demonstrate how the sparsity of the personal road network of a driver in conjunction with a hierarchical topic model allows data driven predictions about destinations as well as likely road conditions. Julian Straub, Sue Zheng, John W. Fisher III |
Intelligent Vehicles Symposium | 2 |