EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel S. Walker
dblp:07/7747
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Human-robot interaction · 68% Interaction techniques and input · 32% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | Demonstrating the benefits of variable impedance to telerobotic task execution · ICRA 2011 User-controlled variable impedance teleoperation · ICRA 2010 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › assembly
peg insertion |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Demonstrating the benefits of variable impedance to telerobotic task execution · ICRA 2011 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › manipulation control
quasi-static manipulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Demonstrating the benefits of variable impedance to telerobotic task execution · ICRA 2011 |
Interaction techniques and input › input sensing › touch sensing
grip sensing |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | User-controlled variable impedance teleoperation · ICRA 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variable impedance actuation · 0.2variable clutch actuator · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Demonstrating the benefits of variable impedance to telerobotic task executionabstractInspired by human physiology, variable impedance actuation has been shown to benefit safety with its ability to modulate impact forces. But humans also continually adjust impedance during contact and throughout manipulation tasks. We examine the value and effect of continual impedance variation on quasi-static manipulation. We approach this challenge from the perspective of telerobotics where the operator can explicitly modulate the robotic impedance. Using a three degree of freedom planar teleoperation system we explore two quasi-static tasks: inserting a rigid peg into a tight hole and throwing a switch without overshoot. The work finds that no single impedance can optimally accomplish both tasks. Instead user-controlled impedance variations achieve the desired results, demonstrating the benefits of variable impedance to quasi-static applications in telerobotics. Daniel S. Walker, John Kenneth Salisbury Jr., Günter Niemeyer |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2010 | User-controlled variable impedance teleoperationabstractTelerobotics fundamentally aims to project human skills into a remote, unstructured environment. A key component of human skills is anticipatory modulation of limb impedances in accordance with task requirements and in expectation of events or disturbances. These adjustments occur continually in human interaction strategies, yet are mostly masked in telerobotics by limited bandwidth controllers and fixed impedance hardware. We propose a telerobotic architecture with user-controlled variable impedance and show a single degree of freedom experimental implementation. The master incorporates a grip force sensor as an additional impedance command channel. Since grip force correlates with the user's own impedance, this input provides an intuitive and natural extension to the regular interface. On the slave, a physically variable clutch actuator is used to adjust both low and high frequency impedance. The additional command channel allows the operator to utilize impedance variation strategies to control impact forces and accomplish varying tasks. These natural interaction strategies are simpler and more robust, leading to superior performance and a telerobot which more effectively represents the operator. Daniel S. Walker, Robert P. Wilson, Günter Niemeyer |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2010 | Examining The benefits of variable impedance actuationabstractVariable impedance actuators provide the ability to robustly alter interaction impedances mechanically, without bandwidth, power, and stability limitations. They can achieve the physical benefits of an elastic transmission and also recover characteristics of traditionally controlled, inelastic motors. We review previously explored benefits of variable impedance actuators for energetic tasks and impact safety. We then focus on benefits in low frequency force interactions. We examine impedance and force dynamic ranges and illustrate how they are significantly increased by physical impedance variation. Theoretical analysis is confirmed by experiments on a 1-DOF testbed with three impedance settings. Daniel S. Walker, Günter Niemeyer |
IROS | 1 |
| 2009 | Variable impedance magnetorheological Clutch Actuator and telerobotic implementationabstractVariable impedance actuation is characterized by the ability to independently set output force and output impedance for a robotic device. Adjusting the output impedance in real-time allows a device to better adapt to a variety of tasks, operate in human-like fashion, and support human safety. This paper focuses on a series clutch actuator based on magnetorheological fluid which allows a fast, electrical change of the impedance while maintaining good force tracking. In particular the mechanical clutch can alter the high-frequency impedance, decoupling the motor inertia and thus reducing impact forces. We present the mechanical clutch design and a control system architecture to automatically adjust the fluid magnetization level and leverage the clutch benefits. Experiments verify torque tracking and impact force reduction both in autonomous and telerobotic operation. The actuator was designed and manufactured in collaboration with the Materials Design Institute at Los Alamos National Laboratory, and is tested in a single degree of freedom demonstration. Daniel S. Walker, Dan J. Thoma, Günter Niemeyer |
IROS | 1 |