Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nikolas Gloy

dblp:07/7849 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Graph data management · 40% Distributed and cloud data management · 40% Information retrieval · 20%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph data management › graph database
distributed graph database
0.412020
A1: A Distributed In-Memory Graph Database · SIGMOD Conference 2020
Distributed and cloud data management
distributed query processing
0.412020
A1: A Distributed In-Memory Graph Database · SIGMOD Conference 2020
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
remote direct memory access
0.112020
A1: A Distributed In-Memory Graph Database · SIGMOD Conference 2020
Information retrieval
query log analysis
0.112010
Inferring search behaviors using partially observable Markov (POM) model · WSDM 2010
Information retrieval › user behavior
search behavior analysis
0.112010
Inferring search behaviors using partially observable Markov (POM) model · WSDM 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

RDMA · 0.9FaRM · 0.9viterbi training · 0.1segmental viterbi algorithm · 0.1partially observable markov model · 0.1hidden markov model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 A1: A Distributed In-Memory Graph Database
abstract
A1 is an in-memory distributed database used by the Bing search engine to support complex queries over structured data. The key enablers for A1 are availability of cheap DRAM and high speed RDMA (Remote Direct Memory Access) networking in commodity hardware. A1 uses FaRM [11,12] as its underlying storage layer and builds the graph abstraction and query engine on top. The combination of in-memory storage and RDMA access requires rethinking how data is allocated, organized and queried in a large distributed system. A single A1 cluster can store tens of billions of vertices and edges and support a throughput of 350+ million of vertex reads per second with end to end query latency in single digit milliseconds. In this paper we describe the A1 data model, RDMA optimized data structures and query execution.
Chiranjeeb Buragohain, Knut Magne Risvik, Paul Brett, Miguel Castro 0001, Wonhee Cho 0004, Joshua Cowhig, Nikolas Gloy, Karthik Kalyanaraman, Richendra Khanna, John Pao, Matthew Renzelmann, Alex Shamis, Timothy Tan, Shuheng Zheng
SIGMOD Conference7
2010 Inferring search behaviors using partially observable Markov (POM) model
abstract
This article describes an application of the partially observable Markov (POM) model to the analysis of a large scale commercial web search log. Mathematically, POM is a variant of the hidden Markov model in which all the hidden state transitions do not necessarily emit observable events. This property of POM is used to model, as the hidden process, a common search behavior that users would read and skip search results, leaving no observable user actions to record in the search logs. The Markov nature of the model further lends support to cope with the facts that a single observed sequence can be probabilistically associated with many hidden sequences that have variable lengths, and the search results can be read in various temporal orders that are not necessarily reflected in the observed sequence of user actions. To tackle the implementation challenges accompanying the flexibility and analytic powers of POM, we introduce segmental Viterbi algorithm based on segmental decoding and Viterbi training to train the POM model parameters and apply them to uncover hidden processes from the search logs. To validate the model, the latent variables modeling the browsing patterns on the search result page are compared with the experimental data of the eye tracking stu-dies. The close agreements suggest that the search logs do contain rich information of user behaviors in browsing the search result page even though they are not directly observable, and that using POM to understand these sophisticated search behaviors is a promising approach.
Kuansan Wang, Nikolas Gloy
WSDM2