Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Derek Chan

dblp:07/8003 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational photography and imaging · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.112010
3D shape scanning with a time-of-flight camera · CVPR 2010
Computer vision › 3D vision › range sensing
3d scanning
0.112010
3D shape scanning with a time-of-flight camera · CVPR 2010
Computational photography and imaging › time-of-flight imaging
time-of-flight depth sensing
0.012010
3D shape scanning with a time-of-flight camera · CVPR 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic scan alignment · 0.2filtering · 0.23d superresolution · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 3D shape scanning with a time-of-flight camera
abstract
We describe a method for 3D object scanning by aligning depth scans that were taken from around an object with a time-of-flight camera. These ToF cameras can measure depth scans at video rate. Due to comparably simple technology they bear potential for low cost production in big volumes. Our easy-to-use, cost-effective scanning solution based on such a sensor could make 3D scanning technology more accessible to everyday users. The algorithmic challenge we face is that the sensor's level of random noise is substantial and there is a non-trivial systematic bias. In this paper we show the surprising result that 3D scans of reasonable quality can also be obtained with a sensor of such low data quality. Established filtering and scan alignment techniques from the literature fail to achieve this goal. In contrast, our algorithm is based on a new combination of a 3D superresolution method with a probabilistic scan alignment approach that explicitly takes into account the sensor's noise characteristics.
Yan Cui 0011, Sebastian Schuon, Derek Chan, Sebastian Thrun, Christian Theobalt
CVPR3