Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shaowen Wang 0002
dblp:07/852-2
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 57% Efficient and distributed learning · 27% Language models and text generation · 16% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 67% Machine learning and data management · 33% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Understanding LLM Behaviors via Compression: Data Generation, Knowledge Acquisition and Scaling Laws · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LoRA-GA: Low-Rank Adaptation with Gradient Approximation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Data integration and cleaning › data generation › synthetic data generation
tabular data generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generative Table Pre-training Empowers Models for Tabular Prediction · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning and data management › tabular data learning
tabular data prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generative Table Pre-training Empowers Models for Tabular Prediction · EMNLP 2023 |
Data integration and cleaning › data generation › synthetic data generation
tabular data synthesis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generative Table Pre-training Empowers Models for Tabular Prediction · EMNLP 2023 |
Computational complexity
kolmogorov complexity |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Understanding LLM Behaviors via Compression: Data Generation, Knowledge Acquisition and Scaling Laws · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model
table pre-training |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Generative Table Pre-training Empowers Models for Tabular Prediction · EMNLP 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
two-part coding · 1.7bayesian analysis · 1.7transformer · 1.3table pre-training · 1.3MLP · 1.3LightGBM · 1.3low-rank adaptation · 0.8gradient approximation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Understanding LLM Behaviors via Compression: Data Generation, Knowledge Acquisition and Scaling LawsabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across numerous tasks, yet principled explanations for their underlying mechanisms and several phenomena, such as scaling laws, hallucinations, and related behaviors, remain elusive. In this work, we revisit the classical relationship between compression and prediction, grounded in Kolmogorov complexity and Shannon information theory, to provide deeper insights into LLM behaviors. By leveraging the Kolmogorov Structure Function and interpreting LLM compression as a two-part coding process, we offer a detailed view of how LLMs acquire and store information across increasing model and data scales -- from pervasive syntactic patterns to progressively rarer knowledge elements. Motivated by this theoretical perspective and natural assumptions inspired by Heap’s and Zipf’s laws, we introduce a simplified yet representative hierarchical data-generation framework called the Syntax-Knowledge model. Under the Bayesian setting, we show that prediction and compression within this model naturally lead to diverse learning and scaling behaviors of LLMs. In particular, our theoretical analysis offers intuitive and principled explanations for both data and model scaling laws, the dynamics of knowledge acquisition during training and fine-tuning, factual knowledge hallucinations in LLMs. The experimental results validate our theoretical predictions. Zhixuan Pan, Shaowen Wang 0002, Pengfei Liao |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | LoRA-GA: Low-Rank Adaptation with Gradient ApproximationabstractFine-tuning large-scale pretrained models is prohibitively expensive in terms of computational and memory costs. LoRA, as one of the most popular Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods, offers a cost-effective alternative by fine-tuning an auxiliary low-rank model that has significantly fewer parameters. Although LoRA reduces the computational and memory requirements significantly at each iteration, extensive empirical evidence indicates that it converges at a considerably slower rate compared to full fine-tuning, ultimately leading to increased overall compute and often worse test performance. In our paper, we perform an in-depth investigation of the initialization method of LoRA and show that careful initialization (without any change of the architecture and the training algorithm) can significantly enhance both efficiency and performance. In particular, we introduce a novel initialization method, LoRA-GA (Low Rank Adaptation with Gradient Approximation), which aligns the gradients of low-rank matrix product with those of full fine-tuning at the first step. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that LoRA-GA achieves a convergence rate comparable to that of full fine-tuning (hence being significantly faster than vanilla LoRA as well as various recent improvements) while simultaneously attaining comparable or even better performance. For example, on the subset of the GLUE dataset with T5-Base, LoRA-GA outperforms LoRA by 5.69% on average. On larger models such as Llama 2-7B, LoRA-GA shows performance improvements of 0.34, 11.52%, and 5.05% on MTbench, GSM8k, and Human-eval, respectively. Additionally, we observe up to 2-4 times convergence speed improvement compared to vanilla LoRA, validating its effectiveness in accelerating convergence and enhancing model performance. Shaowen Wang 0002, Linxi Yu |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Generative Table Pre-training Empowers Models for Tabular PredictionabstractRecently, the topic of table pre-training has attracted considerable research interest.However, how to employ table pre-training to boost the performance of tabular prediction remains an open challenge.In this paper, we propose TAPTAP, the first attempt that leverages table pre-training to empower models for tabular prediction.After pre-training on a large corpus of real-world tabular data, TAPTAP can generate high-quality synthetic tables to support various applications on tabular data, including privacy protection, low resource regime, missing value imputation, and imbalanced classification.Extensive experiments on 12 datasets demonstrate that TAPTAP outperforms a total of 16 baselines in different scenarios.Meanwhile, it can be easily combined with various backbone models, including LightGBM, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Transformer.Moreover, with the aid of table pre-training, models trained using synthetic data generated by TAPTAP can even compete with models using the original dataset on half of the experimental datasets, marking a milestone in the development of synthetic tabular data generation.The code and datasets are available at https: //github.com/ZhangTP1996/TapTap. Tianping Zhang, Shaowen Wang 0002, Shuicheng Yan, Li Jian, Qian Liu 0033 |
EMNLP | 2 |