Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Klaus Macherey

dblp:08/1031 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Machine translation · 33% Speech recognition and synthesis · 29% Information extraction and text analysis · 19%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
morphological analysis
0.112011
Language-independent compound splitting with morphological operations · ACL 2011
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
word alignment
0.112011
Model-Based Aligner Combination Using Dual Decomposition · ACL 2011
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition
0.112009
Applications of Statistical Machine Translation Approaches to Spoken Language Understanding · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2009
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › training criteria
minimum error rate training
0.112009
Applications of Statistical Machine Translation Approaches to Spoken Language Understanding · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2009
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
spoken language understanding
0.112009
Applications of Statistical Machine Translation Approaches to Spoken Language Understanding · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2009
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.112009
Applications of Statistical Machine Translation Approaches to Spoken Language Understanding · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2009
Audio and music processing
speech recognition
0.012001
Confidence measures for large vocabulary continuous speech recognition · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2001
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
spoken dialogue systems
0.012009
Applications of Statistical Machine Translation Approaches to Spoken Language Understanding · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

morphological operations · 0.1dual decomposition · 0.1source-channel model · 0.1minimum error rate training · 0.1maximum entropy · 0.1log-linear model · 0.1n-best list · 0.0hypothesis density · 0.0forward-backward algorithm · 0.0acoustic stability · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Model-Based Aligner Combination Using Dual Decomposition
John DeNero, Klaus Macherey
ACL2
2011 Language-independent compound splitting with morphological operations
Klaus Macherey, Andrew M. Dai, David Talbot, Ashok C. Popat, Franz Josef Och
ACL1
2009 Creating a High-Quality Machine Translation System for a Low-Resource Language: Yiddish
Dmitriy Genzel, Klaus Macherey, Jakob Uszkoreit
MTSummit2
2009 Applications of Statistical Machine Translation Approaches to Spoken Language Understanding
abstract
In this paper, we investigate two statistical methods for spoken language understanding based on statistical machine translation. The first approach employs the source-channel paradigm, whereas the other uses the maximum entropy framework. Starting with an annotated corpus, we describe the problem of natural language understanding as a translation from a source sentence to a formal language target sentence. We analyze the quality of different alignment models and feature functions and show that the direct maximum entropy approach outperforms the source channel-based method. Furthermore, we investigate how both methods perform if the input sentences contain speech recognition errors. Finally, we investigate a new approach to combine speech recognition and spoken language understanding. For this purpose, we employ minimum error rate training which directly optimizes the final evaluation criterion. By combining all knowledge sources in a log-linear way, we show that we can decrease both the word error rate and the slot error rate. Experiments were carried out on two German inhouse corpora for spoken dialogue systems.
Klaus Macherey, Oliver Bender, Hermann Ney
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.1
2004 Large Scale Experiments for Semantic Labeling of Noun Phrases in Raw Text
Louise Guthrie, Roberto Basili 0001, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto, Kalina Bontcheva, Hamish Cunningham, David Guthrie, Jia Cui, Marco Cammisa, Jerry Cheng-Chieh Liu, Cassia Farria Martin, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Martin Holub, Klaus Macherey, Frederick Jelinek
LREC13
2003 Comparison of Alignment Templates and Maximum Entropy Models for NLP
Oliver Bender, Klaus Macherey, Franz Josef Och, Hermann Ney
EACL2
2003 Features for tree based dialogue course management
abstract
In this paper, we introduce different features for dialogue course management and investigate their effect on the system’s behaviour for choosing the subsequent dialogue action during a dialogue session. Especially, we investigate whether the system is able to detect and resolve ambiguities, and if it always chooses that state which leads as quickly as possible to a final state that presumably meets the user’s request. The criteria and used data structures are independently from the underlying domain and can therefore be used for different applications of spoken dialogue systems.
Klaus Macherey, Hermann Ney
INTERSPEECH1
2003 Confidence measures for statistical machine translation
abstract
In this paper, we present several confidence measures for (statistical) machine translation. We introduce word posterior probabilities for words in the target sentence that can be determined either on a word graph or on an N best list. Two alternative confidence measures that can be calculated on N best lists are proposed. The performance of the measures is evaluated on two different translation tasks: on spontaneously spoken dialogues from the domain of appointment scheduling, and on a collection of technical manuals.
Nicola Ueffing, Klaus Macherey, Hermann Ney
MTSummit2
2001 Natural language understanding using statistical machine translation
abstract
Over the past years, automatic dialogue systems and telephonebased machine inquiry systems have received increasing attention. In addition to an automatic speech recognizer and a dialogue manager, such systems consist of a natural language understanding (NLU) component. Some of the most investigated approaches to NLU are rule-based methods as Stochastic Grammars, which are often written manually. However, the sole usage of rule-based methods can turn out to be inflexible and the problem of reusability occurs. When extending the application scenario or changing the application's domain itself, a large part of the set of rules often must be rewritten. Therefore, techniques are desirable which help to reduce the manual effort when building up an NLU component for a new domain. In this paper we investigate an approach to NLU, which is derived from the field of statistical machine translation. Starting from a conceptual annotated corpus, we describe the problem of NLU as a translation from a source sentence to a formallanguage target sentence. Doing this, we will mainly focus on the quality of different alignment models between source and target sentences. Even though the usage of grammars cannot be totally avoided in NLU-systems, it is our goal to reduce their employment and learn the dependencies between words and their meaning automatically. Experiments were performed on the Philips in-house TABA corpus, which is a text corpus in the domain of a German train timetable information system. 1.
Klaus Macherey, Franz Josef Och, Hermann Ney
INTERSPEECH1
2001 Confidence measures for large vocabulary continuous speech recognition
abstract
In this paper, we present several confidence measures for large vocabulary continuous speech recognition. We propose to estimate the confidence of a hypothesized word directly as its posterior probability, given all acoustic observations of the utterance. These probabilities are computed on word graphs using a forward-backward algorithm. We also study the estimation of posterior probabilities on N-best lists instead of word graphs and compare both algorithms in detail. In addition, we compare the posterior probabilities with two alternative confidence measures, i.e., the acoustic stability and the hypothesis density. We present experimental results on five different corpora: the Dutch ARISE 1k evaluation corpus, the German Verbmobil '98 7k evaluation corpus, the English North American Business '94 20k and 64k development corpora, and the English Broadcast News '96 65k evaluation corpus. We show that the posterior probabilities computed on word graphs outperform all other confidence measures. The relative reduction in confidence error rate ranges between 19% and 35% compared to the baseline confidence error rate.
Frank Wessel, Ralf Schlüter, Klaus Macherey, Hermann Ney
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.3
1999 A comparison of word graph and n-best list based confidence measures
abstract
In this paper we present and compare several confidence measures for large vocabulary continuous speech recognition. We show that posterior word probabilities computed on word graphs and N-best lists clearly outperform non-probabilistic confidence measures, e.g. the acoustic stability and the hypothesis density. In addition, we prove that the estimation of posterior word probabilities on word graphs yields better results than their estimation on N-best lists and discuss both methods in detail. We present experimental results on three different corpora, the English NAB '94 20k development corpus, the German VERBMOBIL '96 evaluation corpus and a Dutch corpus, which has been recorded with a train timetable information system in the ARISE project. 1. INTRODUCTION In previous studies, the combination of several confidence features was investigated. These features were collected during the acoustic decoding process, e.g. [1] or were extracted from Nbest lists and word graphs, e.g. [2, 5]. ...
Frank Wessel, Klaus Macherey, Hermann Ney
EUROSPEECH2
1998 Using word probabilities as confidence measures
abstract
Estimates of confidence for the output of a speech recognition system can be used in many practical applications of speech recognition technology. They can be employed for detecting possible errors and can help to avoid undesirable verification turns in automatic inquiry systems. We propose to estimate the confidence in a hypothesized word as its posterior probability, given all acoustic feature vectors of the speaker utterance. The basic idea of our approach is to estimate the posterior word probabilities as the sum of all word hypothesis probabilities which represent the occurrence of the same word in more or less the same segment of time. The word hypothesis probabilities are approximated by paths in a wordgraph and are computed using a simplified forward-backward algorithm. We present experimental results on the North American Business (NAB'94) and the German Verbmobil recognition task.
Frank Wessel, Klaus Macherey, Ralf Schlüter
ICASSP2