Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julien Rivaud

dblp:08/10359 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 50% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory › topological graph theory
surface-embedded graphs
0.112012
On the Homotopy Test on Surfaces · FOCS 2012
Computational geometry
topological algorithms
0.112012
On the Homotopy Test on Surfaces · FOCS 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

small cancellation theory · 0.1geometric approach · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 On the Homotopy Test on Surfaces
abstract
Let G be a graph cellularly embedded in a surface S. Given two closed walks c and d in G, we take advantage of the RAM model to describe linear time algorithms to decide if c and d are homotopic in S, either freely or with fixed base point. After O(|G|) time preprocessing independent of c and d, our algorithms answer the homotopy test in O(|c| + |d|) time, where |G|, |c| and |d| are the respective numbers of edges of G, c and d. These results were previously announced by Dey and Guha (1999). Their approach was based on small cancellation theory from combinatorial group theory. However, several flaws in their algorithms make their approach fail, leaving the complexity of the homotopy test problem still open. We present a geometric approach, based on previous works by Colin de Verdière and Erickson, that provides optimal homotopy tests.
Francis Lazarus, Julien Rivaud
FOCS2