Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Harald Ullrich

dblp:08/1476 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Database system architecture and tuning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
commonsense knowledge
0.012002
Naive Semantics to Support Automated Database Design · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2002
Database system architecture and tuning › database design
database design tools
0.012002
Naive Semantics to Support Automated Database Design · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ontology implementation · 0.1knowledge base construction · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Naive Semantics to Support Automated Database Design
abstract
Research devoted to developing knowledge-based tools for database design has demonstrated that it is possible to encode a great deal of process knowledge about database design in a (knowledge-based) computer program. However, experience with these tools shows that the contribution of an expert human designer extends beyond his or her knowledge of database design techniques. The paper discusses the application of an approach, called Naive Semantics (NS), to simulate the contributions made to a design based on the designer's general knowledge. Naive semantics involves the use of an extensible store of generally understood knowledge about the world. The paper describes the types of information that could be included in a Naive Semantics knowledge base and how that knowledge might be applied to increase the effectiveness of automated database design systems. Results of various implementations of ontologies based on Naive Semantics are discussed.
Veda C. Storey, Robert C. Goldstein, Harald Ullrich
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.3
2000 An Ontology for Classifying the Semantics of Relationships in Database Design
Harald Ullrich, Sandeep Purao, Veda C. Storey
NLDB1
1998 An Ontology-Based Expert System for Database Design
abstract
Although it is possible to encode a great deal of process knowledge about database design into a system, experience has shown that the contribution of a human designer extends beyond his or her knowledge of database design techniques. The next step in the evolution of automated database design tools is to incorporate knowledge and reasoning capabilities to support this higher level of participation. Doing so requires some understanding of what different terms mean. This paper presents an ontology that can be used as a surrogate for the meaning of words in a database design system to simulate the contributions that a designer would make based on his or her general knowledge. The ontology classifies a term into one or more categories such as person, abstract good or tradable document. It is comprised of a semantic network, a knowledge base containing information on the meaning of terms that have been classified, an expert system knowledge-acquisition component, and a distance measure for assessing the distance between the meanings of terms. The ontology was tested by different types of users on a variety of problems and was shown to be quite effective.
Veda C. Storey, Debabrata Dey, Harald Ullrich, Shankar Sundaresan
Data Knowl. Eng.3
1997 An Ontology for Database Design Automation
Veda C. Storey, Harald Ullrich, Shankar Sundaresan
ER2