Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joseph Masiero

dblp:08/1609 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 87% Algorithms and data structures · 13%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 50% Spatial and temporal data management · 50%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
pattern mining
0.112005
Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005
Spatial and temporal data management › spatial analysis
spatial pattern matching
0.112005
Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005
Computational geometry › spatial data structures
kd-tree
0.112005
Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005
Computational geometry
spatial data structures
0.112005
Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search
nearest neighbor search
0.012005
Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multiple tree algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery
abstract
In this paper we consider the problem of finding sets of points that conform to a given underlying model from within a dense, noisy set of observations. This problem is motivated by the task of efficiently linking faint asteroid detections, but is applicable to a range of spatial queries. We survey current tree-based approaches, showing a trade-off exists between single tree and multiple tree algorithms. To this end, we present a new type of multiple tree algorithm that uses a variable number of trees to exploit the advantages of both approaches. We empirically show that this algorithm performs well using both simulated and astronomical data.
Jeremy Kubica, Joseph Masiero, Andrew W. Moore 0001, Robert Jedicke, Andrew J. Connolly
NIPS2