Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joseph Masiero
dblp:08/1609
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational geometry · 87% Algorithms and data structures · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 50% Spatial and temporal data management · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005 |
Spatial and temporal data management › spatial analysis
spatial pattern matching |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005 |
Computational geometry › spatial data structures
kd-tree |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005 |
Computational geometry
spatial data structures |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005 |
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search
nearest neighbor search |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and Discovery · NIPS 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multiple tree algorithm · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Variable KD-Tree Algorithms for Spatial Pattern Search and DiscoveryabstractIn this paper we consider the problem of finding sets of points that conform to a given underlying model from within a dense, noisy set of observations. This problem is motivated by the task of efficiently linking faint asteroid detections, but is applicable to a range of spatial queries. We survey current tree-based approaches, showing a trade-off exists between single tree and multiple tree algorithms. To this end, we present a new type of multiple tree algorithm that uses a variable number of trees to exploit the advantages of both approaches. We empirically show that this algorithm performs well using both simulated and astronomical data. Jeremy Kubica, Joseph Masiero, Andrew W. Moore 0001, Robert Jedicke, Andrew J. Connolly |
NIPS | 2 |