Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nir Yosef
dblp:08/1993
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9004-1225ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
6 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 37% Generative modeling · 20% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 18% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › phylogenetic inference
neighbor-joining |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tree Reconstruction Guarantees from CRISPR-Cas9 Lineage Tracing Data Using Neighbor-Joining · RECOMB 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tree Reconstruction Guarantees from CRISPR-Cas9 Lineage Tracing Data Using Neighbor-Joining · RECOMB 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
single-cell analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Identifying Systematic Variation at the Single-Cell Level by Leveraging Low-Resolution Population-Level Data · RECOMB 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.5 | 2 | 2020 | Information Constraints on Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes · NeurIPS 2018 Decision-Making with Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Decision-Making with Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes · NeurIPS 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell genomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Interpretable factor models of single-cell RNA-seq via variational autoencoders · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell RNA sequencing
single-cell RNA-seq analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Interpretable factor models of single-cell RNA-seq via variational autoencoders · Bioinform. 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
invariant representation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Information Constraints on Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes · NeurIPS 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | ImpulseDE: detection of differentially expressed genes in time series data using impulse models · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
time series gene expression |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | ImpulseDE: detection of differentially expressed genes in time series data using impulse models · Bioinform. 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | AutoEval Done Right: Using Synthetic Data for Model Evaluation · ICML 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
lineage tracing |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Tree Reconstruction Guarantees from CRISPR-Cas9 Lineage Tracing Data Using Neighbor-Joining · RECOMB 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell RNA sequencing |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Information Constraints on Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes · NeurIPS 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
transcriptomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | ImpulseDE: detection of differentially expressed genes in time series data using impulse models · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genotype-phenotype association |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | A supervised approach for identifying discriminating genotype patterns and its application to breast cancer data · Bioinform. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic data generation · 0.9statistical estimation · 0.9neighbor-joining · 0.9variational inference · 0.7kernel independence measure · 0.7hilbert-schmidt independence criterion · 0.7statistical inference · 0.6variational autoencoder · 0.4multiple importance sampling · 0.4importance sampling · 0.4auto-encoding variational bayes · 0.4multithreading · 0.3impulse model · 0.3clustering · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AutoEval Done Right: Using Synthetic Data for Model EvaluationabstractThe evaluation of machine learning models using human-labeled validation data can be expensive and time-consuming. AI-labeled synthetic data can be used to decrease the number of human annotations required for this purpose in a process called autoevaluation. We suggest efficient and statistically principled algorithms for this purpose that improve sample efficiency while remaining unbiased. Pierre Boyeau, Anastasios Angelopoulos, Tianle Li, Nir Yosef, Jitendra Malik, Michael I. Jordan |
ICML | 4 |
| 2025 | Tree Reconstruction Guarantees from CRISPR-Cas9 Lineage Tracing Data Using Neighbor-Joining
Sebastian Prillo, Kevin An, Wilson Wu, Ivan Kristanto, Matthew G. Jones, Yun S. Song, Nir Yosef |
RECOMB | 7 |
| 2022 | Identifying Systematic Variation at the Single-Cell Level by Leveraging Low-Resolution Population-Level Data
Elior Rahmani, Michael I. Jordan, Nir Yosef |
RECOMB | 3 |
| 2020 | Decision-Making with Auto-Encoding Variational BayesabstractTo make decisions based on a model fit with auto-encoding variational Bayes (AEVB), practitioners often let the variational distribution serve as a surrogate for the posterior distribution. This approach yields biased estimates of the expected risk, and therefore leads to poor decisions for two reasons. First, the model fit with AEVB may not equal the underlying data distribution. Second, the variational distribution may not equal the posterior distribution under the fitted model. We explore how fitting the variational distribution based on several objective functions other than the ELBO, while continuing to fit the generative model based on the ELBO, affects the quality of downstream decisions. For the probabilistic principal component analysis model, we investigate how importance sampling error, as well as the bias of the model parameter estimates, varies across several approximate posteriors when used as proposal distributions. Our theoretical results suggest that a posterior approximation distinct from the variational distribution should be used for making decisions. Motivated by these theoretical results, we propose learning several approximate proposals for the best model and combining them using multiple importance sampling for decision-making. In addition to toy examples, we present a full-fledged case study of single-cell RNA sequencing. In this challenging instance of multiple hypothesis testing, our proposed approach surpasses the current state of the art. Romain Lopez, Pierre Boyeau, Nir Yosef, Michael I. Jordan, Jeffrey Regier |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Interpretable factor models of single-cell RNA-seq via variational autoencodersabstractMOTIVATION: Single-cell RNA-seq makes possible the investigation of variability in gene expression among cells, and dependence of variation on cell type. Statistical inference methods for such analyses must be scalable, and ideally interpretable. RESULTS: We present an approach based on a modification of a recently published highly scalable variational autoencoder framework that provides interpretability without sacrificing much accuracy. We demonstrate that our approach enables identification of gene programs in massive datasets. Our strategy, namely the learning of factor models with the auto-encoding variational Bayes framework, is not domain specific and may be useful for other applications. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The factor model is available in the scVI package hosted at https://github.com/YosefLab/scVI/. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Valentine Svensson, Adam Gayoso, Nir Yosef, Lior Pachter |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2018 | Information Constraints on Auto-Encoding Variational BayesabstractParameterizing the approximate posterior of a generative model with neural networks has become a common theme in recent machine learning research. While providing appealing flexibility, this approach makes it difficult to impose or assess structural constraints such as conditional independence. We propose a framework for learning representations that relies on Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes and whose search space is constrained via kernel-based measures of independence. In particular, our method employs the $d$-variable Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (dHSIC) to enforce independence between the latent representations and arbitrary nuisance factors. We show how to apply this method to a range of problems, including the problems of learning invariant representations and the learning of interpretable representations. We also present a full-fledged application to single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). In this setting the biological signal in mixed in complex ways with sequencing errors and sampling effects. We show that our method out-performs the state-of-the-art in this domain. Romain Lopez, Jeffrey Regier, Michael I. Jordan, Nir Yosef |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2017 | ImpulseDE: detection of differentially expressed genes in time series data using impulse modelsabstractSummary: Perturbations in the environment lead to distinctive gene expression changes within a cell. Observed over time, those variations can be characterized by single impulse-like progression patterns. ImpulseDE is an R package suited to capture these patterns in high throughput time series datasets. By fitting a representative impulse model to each gene, it reports differentially expressed genes across time points from a single or between two time courses from two experiments. To optimize running time, the code uses clustering and multi-threading. By applying ImpulseDE , we demonstrate its power to represent underlying biology of gene expression in microarray and RNA-Seq data. Availability and Implementation: ImpulseDE is available on Bioconductor ( https://bioconductor.org/packages/ImpulseDE/ ). Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jil Sander, Joachim L. Schultze, Nir Yosef |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2016 | FastProject: a tool for low-dimensional analysis of single-cell RNA-Seq dataabstractBACKGROUND: A key challenge in the emerging field of single-cell RNA-Seq is to characterize phenotypic diversity between cells and visualize this information in an informative manner. A common technique when dealing with high-dimensional data is to project the data to 2 or 3 dimensions for visualization. However, there are a variety of methods to achieve this result and once projected, it can be difficult to ascribe biological significance to the observed features. Additionally, when analyzing single-cell data, the relationship between cells can be obscured by technical confounders such as variable gene capture rates. RESULTS: To aid in the analysis and interpretation of single-cell RNA-Seq data, we have developed FastProject, a software tool which analyzes a gene expression matrix and produces a dynamic output report in which two-dimensional projections of the data can be explored. Annotated gene sets (referred to as gene 'signatures') are incorporated so that features in the projections can be understood in relation to the biological processes they might represent. FastProject provides a novel method of scoring each cell against a gene signature so as to minimize the effect of missed transcripts as well as a method to rank signature-projection pairings so that meaningful associations can be quickly identified. Additionally, FastProject is written with a modular architecture and designed to serve as a platform for incorporating and comparing new projection methods and gene selection algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: Here we present FastProject, a software package for two-dimensional visualization of single cell data, which utilizes a plethora of projection methods and provides a way to systematically investigate the biological relevance of these low dimensional representations by incorporating domain knowledge. David DeTomaso, Nir Yosef |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2010 | Network-Free Inference of Knockout Effects in YeastabstractPerturbation experiments, in which a certain gene is knocked out and the expression levels of other genes are observed, constitute a fundamental step in uncovering the intricate wiring diagrams in the living cell and elucidating the causal roles of genes in signaling and regulation. Here we present a novel framework for analyzing large cohorts of gene knockout experiments and their genome-wide effects on expression levels. We devise clustering-like algorithms that identify groups of genes that behave similarly with respect to the knockout data, and utilize them to predict knockout effects and to annotate physical interactions between proteins as inhibiting or activating. Differing from previous approaches, our prediction approach does not depend on physical network information; the latter is used only for the annotation task. Consequently, it is both more efficient and of wider applicability than previous methods. We evaluate our approach using a large scale collection of gene knockout experiments in yeast, comparing it to the state-of-the-art SPINE algorithm. In cross validation tests, our algorithm exhibits superior prediction accuracy, while at the same time increasing the coverage by over 25-fold. Significant coverage gains are obtained also in the annotation of the physical network. Tal Peleg, Nir Yosef, Eytan Ruppin, Roded Sharan |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |
| 2007 | A supervised approach for identifying discriminating genotype patterns and its application to breast cancer dataabstractMOTIVATION: Large-scale association studies, investigating the genetic determinants of a phenotype of interest, are producing increasing amounts of genomic variation data on human cohorts. A fundamental challenge in these studies is the detection of genotypic patterns that discriminate individuals exhibiting the phenotype under study from individuals that do not possess it. The difficulty stems from the large number of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) combinations that have to be tested. The discrimination problem becomes even more involved when additional high-throughput data, such as gene expression data, are available for the same cohort. RESULTS: We have developed a graph theoretic approach for identifying discriminating patterns (DPs) for a given phenotype in a genotyped population. The method is based on representing the SNP data as a bipartite graph of individuals and their SNP states, and identifying fully connected subgraphs of this graph that relate individuals enriched for a given phenotypic group. The method can handle additional data types such as expression profiles of the genotyped population. It is reminiscent of biclustering approaches with the crucial difference that its search process is guided by the phenotype under consideration in a supervised manner. We tested our approach in simulations and on real data. In simulations, our method was able to retrieve planted patterns with high success rate. We then applied our approach to a dataset of 72 breast cancer patients with available gene expression profiles, genotyped over 695 SNPs. We detected several DPs that were highly significant with respect to various clinical phenotypes, and investigated the groups of patients and the groups of genes they defined. We found the patient groups to be highly enriched for other phenotypes and to display expression coherency among their profiles. The gene groups displayed functional coherency and involved genes with known role in cancer, providing additional support to their involvement. AVAILABILITY: The program is available upon request. Nir Yosef, Zohar Yakhini, Anya Tsalenko, Vessela N. Kristensen, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale, Eytan Ruppin, Roded Sharan |
Bioinform. | 1 |