EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brian Milch
dblp:08/2512
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 77% Security and privacy of machine learning · 23% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 79% Information retrieval · 15% Data integration and cleaning · 6% | |
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 46% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 32% Multi-agent systems · 22% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
clustering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Clustering for Private Interest-based Advertising · KDD 2021 |
Privacy and data protection › web privacy › online advertising privacy
privacy-preserving advertising |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Clustering for Private Interest-based Advertising · KDD 2021 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
federated learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Clustering for Private Interest-based Advertising · KDD 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
belief representation and revision |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Multi-Agent Filtering with Infinitely Nested Beliefs · NIPS 2008 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › statistical relational learning
lifted inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Lifted Probabilistic Inference with Counting Formulas · AAAI 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Lifted Probabilistic Inference with Counting Formulas · AAAI 2008 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
news retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Query-free news search · WWW 2003 |
Information retrieval › search engines
query-free search |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Query-free news search · WWW 2003 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Identity Uncertainty and Citation Matching · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
probabilistic relational model |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Identity Uncertainty and Citation Matching · NIPS 2002 |
Data integration and cleaning
entity resolution |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Identity Uncertainty and Citation Matching · NIPS 2002 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › interactive document retrieval
online retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Query-free news search · WWW 2003 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
game representation |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Multi-Agent Influence Diagrams for Representing and Solving Games · IJCAI 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
privacy guarantees · 1.0hashing · 1.0clustering · 1.0probabilistic graphical model · 0.1lifted inference · 0.1approximate belief compaction · 0.1probabilistic citation grammar · 0.1markov chain monte carlo · 0.1generative model · 0.1influence diagrams · 0.1first-order logic · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1stemming · 0.0re-ranking · 0.0inverse document frequency · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Clustering for Private Interest-based AdvertisingabstractWe study the problem of designing privacy-enhanced solutions for interest-based advertisement (IBA). IBA is a key component of the online ads ecosystem and provides a better ad experience to users. Indeed, IBA enables advertisers to show users impressions that are relevant to them. Nevertheless, the current way ad tech companies achieve this is by building detailed interest profiles for individual users. In this work we ask whether such fine grained personalization is required, and present mechanisms that achieve competitive performance while giving privacy guarantees to the end users. More precisely we present the first detailed exploration of how to implement Chrome's Federated Learning of Cohorts (FLoC) API. We define the privacy properties required for the API and evaluate multiple hashing and clustering algorithms discussing the trade-offs between utility, privacy, and ease of implementation. Alessandro Epasto, Andrés Muñoz Medina, Steven Avery, Yijian Bai, Róbert Busa-Fekete, CJ Carey, David Guthrie, Subham Ghosh, James Ioannidis, Junyi Jiao, Jakub Lacki, Arne Mauser, Brian Milch, Vahab S. Mirrokni, Deepak Ravichandran, Max Spero, Yunting Sun, Umar Syed, Sergei Vassilvitskii |
KDD | 15 |
| 2008 | Lifted Probabilistic Inference with Counting Formulas
Brian Milch, Luke Zettlemoyer, Kristian Kersting, Michael Haimes, Leslie Pack Kaelbling |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2008 | Multi-Agent Filtering with Infinitely Nested BeliefsabstractIn partially observable worlds with many agents, nested beliefs are formed when agents simultaneously reason about the unknown state of the world and the beliefs of the other agents. The multi-agent filtering problem is to efficiently represent and update these beliefs through time as the agents act in the world. In this paper, we formally define an infinite sequence of nested beliefs about the state of the world at the current time $t$ and present a filtering algorithm that maintains a finite representation which can be used to generate these beliefs. In some cases, this representation can be updated exactly in constant time; we also present a simple approximation scheme to compact beliefs if they become too complex. In experiments, we demonstrate efficient filtering in a range of multi-agent domains. Luke Zettlemoyer, Brian Milch, Leslie Pack Kaelbling |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2007 | Learning Probabilistic Relational Dynamics for Multiple Tasks
Ashwin Deshpande, Brian Milch, Luke Zettlemoyer, Leslie Pack Kaelbling |
UAI | 2 |
| 2006 | First-Order Probabilistic Languages: Into the Unknown
Brian Milch, Stuart Russell 0001 |
ILP | 1 |
| 2006 | General-Purpose MCMC Inference over Relational Structures
Brian Milch, Stuart Russell 0001 |
UAI | 1 |
| 2005 | BLOG: Probabilistic Models with Unknown Objects
Brian Milch, Bhaskara Marthi, Stuart Russell 0001, David A. Sontag, Daniel L. Ong, Andrey Kolobov |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2005 | Query-Free News Search
Monika Henzinger, Bay-Wei Chang, Brian Milch, Sergey Brin |
World Wide Web | 3 |
| 2003 | Query-free news searchabstractMany daily activities present information in the form of a stream of text, and often people can benefit from additional information on the topic discussed. TV broadcast news can be treated as one such stream of text; in this paper we discuss finding news articles on the web that are relevant to news currently being broadcast.We evaluated a variety of algorithms for this problem, looking at the impact of inverse document frequency, stemming, compounds, history, and query length on the relevance and coverage of news articles returned in real time during a broadcast. We also evaluated several postprocessing techniques for improving the precision, including reranking using additional terms, reranking by document similarity, and filtering on document similarity. For the best algorithm, 84%-91% of the articles found were relevant, with at least 64% of the articles being on the exact topic of the broadcast. In addition, a relevant article was found for at least 70% of the topics. Monika Henzinger, Bay-Wei Chang, Brian Milch, Sergey Brin |
WWW | 3 |
| 2002 | Searching the Web by Voice
Alexander Franz, Brian Milch |
COLING | 2 |
| 2002 | Identity Uncertainty and Citation MatchingabstractIdentity uncertainty is a pervasive problem in real-world data analysis. It arises whenever objects are not labeled with unique identifiers or when those identifiers may not be perceived perfectly. In such cases, two ob- servations may or may not correspond to the same object. In this paper, we consider the problem in the context of citation matching—the prob- lem of deciding which citations correspond to the same publication. Our approach is based on the use of a relational probability model to define a generative model for the domain, including models of author and title corruption and a probabilistic citation grammar. Identity uncertainty is handled by extending standard models to incorporate probabilities over the possible mappings between terms in the language and objects in the domain. Inference is based on Markov chain Monte Carlo, augmented with specific methods for generating efficient proposals when the domain contains many objects. Results on several citation data sets show that the method outperforms current algorithms for citation matching. The declarative, relational nature of the model also means that our algorithm can determine object characteristics such as author names by combining multiple citations of multiple papers. Hanna M. Pasula, Bhaskara Marthi, Brian Milch, Stuart Russell 0001, Ilya Shpitser |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2001 | Multi-Agent Influence Diagrams for Representing and Solving Games
Daphne Koller, Brian Milch |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2000 | Probabilistic Models for Agent's Beliefs and Decisions
Brian Milch, Daphne Koller |
UAI | 1 |
| 1999 | SPOOK: A system for probabilistic object-oriented knowledge representation
Avi Pfeffer, Daphne Koller, Brian Milch, Ken T. Takusagawa |
UAI | 3 |