Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Brian Milch

dblp:08/2512 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 77% Security and privacy of machine learning · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data mining · 79% Information retrieval · 15% Data integration and cleaning · 6%
Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 46% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 32% Multi-agent systems · 22%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
clustering
0.512021
Clustering for Private Interest-based Advertising · KDD 2021
Privacy and data protection › web privacy › online advertising privacy
privacy-preserving advertising
0.512021
Clustering for Private Interest-based Advertising · KDD 2021
Security and privacy of machine learning
federated learning
0.112021
Clustering for Private Interest-based Advertising · KDD 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
belief representation and revision
0.112008
Multi-Agent Filtering with Infinitely Nested Beliefs · NIPS 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › statistical relational learning
lifted inference
0.112008
Lifted Probabilistic Inference with Counting Formulas · AAAI 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference
0.112008
Lifted Probabilistic Inference with Counting Formulas · AAAI 2008
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
news retrieval
0.012003
Query-free news search · WWW 2003
Information retrieval › search engines
query-free search
0.012003
Query-free news search · WWW 2003
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.012002
Identity Uncertainty and Citation Matching · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
probabilistic relational model
0.012002
Identity Uncertainty and Citation Matching · NIPS 2002
Data integration and cleaning
entity resolution
0.012002
Identity Uncertainty and Citation Matching · NIPS 2002
Information retrieval › document retrieval › interactive document retrieval
online retrieval
0.012003
Query-free news search · WWW 2003
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
game representation
0.012001
Multi-Agent Influence Diagrams for Representing and Solving Games · IJCAI 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

privacy guarantees · 1.0hashing · 1.0clustering · 1.0probabilistic graphical model · 0.1lifted inference · 0.1approximate belief compaction · 0.1probabilistic citation grammar · 0.1markov chain monte carlo · 0.1generative model · 0.1influence diagrams · 0.1first-order logic · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1stemming · 0.0re-ranking · 0.0inverse document frequency · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Clustering for Private Interest-based Advertising
abstract
We study the problem of designing privacy-enhanced solutions for interest-based advertisement (IBA). IBA is a key component of the online ads ecosystem and provides a better ad experience to users. Indeed, IBA enables advertisers to show users impressions that are relevant to them. Nevertheless, the current way ad tech companies achieve this is by building detailed interest profiles for individual users. In this work we ask whether such fine grained personalization is required, and present mechanisms that achieve competitive performance while giving privacy guarantees to the end users. More precisely we present the first detailed exploration of how to implement Chrome's Federated Learning of Cohorts (FLoC) API. We define the privacy properties required for the API and evaluate multiple hashing and clustering algorithms discussing the trade-offs between utility, privacy, and ease of implementation.
Alessandro Epasto, Andrés Muñoz Medina, Steven Avery, Yijian Bai, Róbert Busa-Fekete, CJ Carey, David Guthrie, Subham Ghosh, James Ioannidis, Junyi Jiao, Jakub Lacki, Arne Mauser, Brian Milch, Vahab S. Mirrokni, Deepak Ravichandran, Max Spero, Yunting Sun, Umar Syed, Sergei Vassilvitskii
KDD15
2008 Lifted Probabilistic Inference with Counting Formulas
Brian Milch, Luke Zettlemoyer, Kristian Kersting, Michael Haimes, Leslie Pack Kaelbling
AAAI1
2008 Multi-Agent Filtering with Infinitely Nested Beliefs
abstract
In partially observable worlds with many agents, nested beliefs are formed when agents simultaneously reason about the unknown state of the world and the beliefs of the other agents. The multi-agent filtering problem is to efficiently represent and update these beliefs through time as the agents act in the world. In this paper, we formally define an infinite sequence of nested beliefs about the state of the world at the current time $t$ and present a filtering algorithm that maintains a finite representation which can be used to generate these beliefs. In some cases, this representation can be updated exactly in constant time; we also present a simple approximation scheme to compact beliefs if they become too complex. In experiments, we demonstrate efficient filtering in a range of multi-agent domains.
Luke Zettlemoyer, Brian Milch, Leslie Pack Kaelbling
NIPS2
2007 Learning Probabilistic Relational Dynamics for Multiple Tasks
Ashwin Deshpande, Brian Milch, Luke Zettlemoyer, Leslie Pack Kaelbling
UAI2
2006 First-Order Probabilistic Languages: Into the Unknown
Brian Milch, Stuart Russell 0001
ILP1
2006 General-Purpose MCMC Inference over Relational Structures
Brian Milch, Stuart Russell 0001
UAI1
2005 BLOG: Probabilistic Models with Unknown Objects
Brian Milch, Bhaskara Marthi, Stuart Russell 0001, David A. Sontag, Daniel L. Ong, Andrey Kolobov
IJCAI1
2005 Query-Free News Search
Monika Henzinger, Bay-Wei Chang, Brian Milch, Sergey Brin
World Wide Web3
2003 Query-free news search
abstract
Many daily activities present information in the form of a stream of text, and often people can benefit from additional information on the topic discussed. TV broadcast news can be treated as one such stream of text; in this paper we discuss finding news articles on the web that are relevant to news currently being broadcast.We evaluated a variety of algorithms for this problem, looking at the impact of inverse document frequency, stemming, compounds, history, and query length on the relevance and coverage of news articles returned in real time during a broadcast. We also evaluated several postprocessing techniques for improving the precision, including reranking using additional terms, reranking by document similarity, and filtering on document similarity. For the best algorithm, 84%-91% of the articles found were relevant, with at least 64% of the articles being on the exact topic of the broadcast. In addition, a relevant article was found for at least 70% of the topics.
Monika Henzinger, Bay-Wei Chang, Brian Milch, Sergey Brin
WWW3
2002 Searching the Web by Voice
Alexander Franz, Brian Milch
COLING2
2002 Identity Uncertainty and Citation Matching
abstract
Identity uncertainty is a pervasive problem in real-world data analysis. It arises whenever objects are not labeled with unique identifiers or when those identifiers may not be perceived perfectly. In such cases, two ob- servations may or may not correspond to the same object. In this paper, we consider the problem in the context of citation matching—the prob- lem of deciding which citations correspond to the same publication. Our approach is based on the use of a relational probability model to define a generative model for the domain, including models of author and title corruption and a probabilistic citation grammar. Identity uncertainty is handled by extending standard models to incorporate probabilities over the possible mappings between terms in the language and objects in the domain. Inference is based on Markov chain Monte Carlo, augmented with specific methods for generating efficient proposals when the domain contains many objects. Results on several citation data sets show that the method outperforms current algorithms for citation matching. The declarative, relational nature of the model also means that our algorithm can determine object characteristics such as author names by combining multiple citations of multiple papers.
Hanna M. Pasula, Bhaskara Marthi, Brian Milch, Stuart Russell 0001, Ilya Shpitser
NIPS3
2001 Multi-Agent Influence Diagrams for Representing and Solving Games
Daphne Koller, Brian Milch
IJCAI2
2000 Probabilistic Models for Agent's Beliefs and Decisions
Brian Milch, Daphne Koller
UAI1
1999 SPOOK: A system for probabilistic object-oriented knowledge representation
Avi Pfeffer, Daphne Koller, Brian Milch, Ken T. Takusagawa
UAI3