Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bill Rosgen
dblp:08/252
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 4 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 70% Mathematical optimization · 30% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic foundations
complexity-based cryptography |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Quantum Commitments from Complexity Assumptions · ICALP (1) 2011 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum cryptography
quantum commitments |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Quantum Commitments from Complexity Assumptions · ICALP (1) 2011 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum cryptography |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Quantum Commitments from Complexity Assumptions · ICALP (1) 2011 |
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computing and quantum information |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | On the Hardness of Distinguishing Mixed-State Quantum Computations · CCC 2005 |
Mathematical optimization
integer programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | On the Hardness of Distinguishing Mixed-State Quantum Computations · CCC 2005 |
Mathematical optimization › integer programming
quantum interactive proofs |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | On the Hardness of Distinguishing Mixed-State Quantum Computations · CCC 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
complexity assumptions · 0.1complexity assumption · 0.1promise problem reduction · 0.1completeness · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Quantum commitments from complexity assumptions
André Chailloux, Iordanis Kerenidis, Bill Rosgen |
Comput. Complex. | 3 |
| 2011 | Quantum Commitments from Complexity Assumptions
André Chailloux, Iordanis Kerenidis, Bill Rosgen |
ICALP (1) | 3 |
| 2008 | Distinguishing Short Quantum ComputationsabstractDistinguishing logarithmic depth quantum circuits on mixed states is shown to be complete for $QIP$, the class of problems having quantum interactive proof systems. Circuits in this model can represent arbitrary quantum processes, and thus this result has implications for the verification of implementations of quantum algorithms. The distinguishability problem is also complete for $QIP$ on constant depth circuits containing the unbounded fan-out gate. These results are shown by reducing a $QIP$-complete problem to a logarithmic depth version of itself using a parallelization technique. Bill Rosgen |
STACS | 1 |
| 2005 | On the Hardness of Distinguishing Mixed-State Quantum ComputationsabstractThis paper considers the following problem. Two mixed-state quantum circuits Q/sub 0/ and Q/sub 1/ are given, and the goal is to determine which of two possibilities holds: (i) Q/sub 0/ and Q/sub 1/ act nearly identically on all possible quantum state inputs, or (ii) there exists some input state /spl rho/ that Q/sub 0/ and Q/sub 1/ transform into almost perfectly distinguishable outputs. This may be viewed as an abstraction of the problem that asks, given two discrete quantum mechanical processes described by sequences of local interactions, are the processes effectively the same or are they different? We prove that this promise problem is complete for the class QIP of problems having quantum interactive proof systems, and is therefore PSPACE-hard. This is in contrast to the fact that the analogous problem for classical (probabilistic) circuits is in AM, and for unitary quantum circuits is in QMA. Bill Rosgen |
CCC | 1 |