Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kenneth Yip
dblp:08/3744
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › probabilistic graphical models
structure discovery |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Structural Inferences from Massive Datasets · IJCAI (1) 1997 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
qualitative reasoning |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Reasoning about Fluid Motion I: Finding Structures · IJCAI 1995 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Structural Inferences from Massive Datasets · IJCAI (1) 1997 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
spatio-temporal reasoning |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Reasoning about Fluid Motion I: Finding Structures · IJCAI 1995 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Structural Inferences from Massive Datasets
Kenneth Yip |
IJCAI (1) | 1 |
| 1996 | Spatial Aggregation: Theory and ApplicationsabstractVisual thinking plays an important role in scientific reasoning. Based on the research in automating diverse reasoning tasks about dynamical systems, nonlinear controllers, kinematic mechanisms, and fluid motion, we have identified a style of visual thinking, imagistic reasoning. Imagistic reasoning organizes computations around image-like, analogue representations so that perceptual and symbolic operations can be brought to bear to infer structure and behavior. Programs incorporating imagistic reasoning have been shown to perform at an expert level in domains that defy current analytic or numerical methods. We have developed a computational paradigm, spatial aggregation, to unify the description of a class of imagistic problem solvers. A program written in this paradigm has the following properties. It takes a continuous field and optional objective functions as input, and produces high-level descriptions of structure, behavior, or control actions. It computes a multi-layer of intermediate representations, called spatial aggregates, by forming equivalence classes and adjacency relations. It employs a small set of generic operators such as aggregation, classification, and localization to perform bidirectional mapping between the information-rich field and successively more abstract spatial aggregates. It uses a data structure, the neighborhood graph, as a common interface to modularize computations. To illustrate our theory, we describe the computational structure of three implemented problem solvers -- KAM, MAPS, and HIPAIR --- in terms of the spatial aggregation generic operators by mixing and matching a library of commonly used routines. Kenneth Yip, Feng Zhao 0001 |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 1 |
| 1995 | Reasoning about Fluid Motion I: Finding Structures
Kenneth Yip |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 1992 | Response to Prolegomena to Any Future Qualitative Physics
Kenneth Yip, Drew McDermott |
Comput. Intell. | 1 |