Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard L. Delanoy

dblp:08/4156 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 60% Image recognition and object detection · 40%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 87% Computational photography and imaging · 13%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition
automatic target recognition
0.011996
Model-based automatic target recognition (ATR) system for forwardlooking groundbased and airborne imaging laser radars (LADAR) · Proc. IEEE 1996
Image and video processing › mathematical morphology
adaptive mathematical morphology
0.011993
Adaptive mathematical morphology for range imagery · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1993
Image and video processing
mathematical morphology
0.011993
Adaptive mathematical morphology for range imagery · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1993
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object recognition
0.011990
Appearance-model-based representation and matching of 3-D objects · ICCV 1990
Computer vision › 3D vision
feature matching
0.011996
Model-based automatic target recognition (ATR) system for forwardlooking groundbased and airborne imaging laser radars (LADAR) · Proc. IEEE 1996
Computational photography and imaging
depth imaging
0.011993
Adaptive mathematical morphology for range imagery · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-based matching · 0.0feature extraction · 0.0structuring elements · 0.0data-dependent morphology · 0.0matching engine · 0.0appearance model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Model-based automatic target recognition (ATR) system for forwardlooking groundbased and airborne imaging laser radars (LADAR)
abstract
We describe an experimental, model-based automatic target recognition (ATR) system, called XTRS, for recognizing tactical vehicles in real or synthetic laser-radar (LADAR) range and intensity images corresponding to a forwardlooking, CO/sub 2/ laser radar (LADAR) that is carried either on a ground vehicle or on an airborne platform. Various aspects of the system's operation are illustrated through a variety of examples. Generic techniques are highlighted whenever possible. A first such technique is the use of feature-indicating interest images to focus attention on specific areas of the input imagery. A second is the use of an application-independent matching engine for matching features extracted from the imagery against an application-dependent appearance model hierarchy that represents the objects to be recognized. A third generic technique is the system's architectures and its control mechanism. Following the description of XTRS, we discuss XTRS's recognition performance on real data collected with the groundbased version of the ladar sensor. We then provide a detailed account of XTRS's performance on synthetic datasets created to rest the limits of system performance. Finally, we briefly discuss the use of XTRS in conjunction with the airborne version of the sensor. Overall, more than 1500 range and intensity image pairs were used throughout XTRS's development.
Jacques G. Verly, Richard L. Delanoy
Proc. IEEE2
1993 Adaptive mathematical morphology for range imagery
abstract
The application of adaptive (i.e., data-dependent) mathematical morphology techniques to range imagery, i.e., the use of structuring elements (SEs) that automatically adjust to the gray-scale values in a range image in order to deal with features of known physical sizes, is discussed. The technique is applicable to any type of image for which the distance to a scene element is available for each pixel.
Jacques G. Verly, Richard L. Delanoy
IEEE Trans. Image Process.2
1992 Functional templates and their application to 3-D object recognition
abstract
A new approach to shape matching and knowledge-based signal processing, called functional template correlation (FTC), is presented in the context of 3D object recognition. Incorporating aspects of fuzzy set theory, functional templates (FTs) define, for each template point, arbitrarily complex tolerances of input image values. With this approach, object- and sensor-dependent knowledge is easily encoded in FTs, making it possible to effectively deal with uncertain or variable object appearance noise occlusion, and articulation. The output of FTC is a map of match scores, reflecting pixel-by-pixel belief of whether or not an encoded shape is present. Such maps can be combined using simple rules of arithmetic and are used to guide selective attention. The use of FTC is illustrated with examples from work in automatic recognition.>
Richard L. Delanoy, Jacques G. Verly, Dan E. Dudgeon
ICASSP1
1990 Appearance-model-based representation and matching of 3-D objects
abstract
A model-based technique is presented for recognizing 3-D objects using a novel object representation and a novel generic matching engine. Each object to be recognized is defined by an appearance model (AM) describing the expected appearances of the object over a range of aspects in a specific type of imagery. The AMs for all the objects to be recognized are organized in an AM hierarchy (AMH) defining object classes. This AMH, together with an image event extracted from the input imagery and primitives obtained by decomposing the event, constitute the input to the matching engine. This engine determines which object in the AMH most likely corresponds to the event and its primitives. The approach described is at the heart of an automatic target recognition system built by the authors.>
Jacques G. Verly, Richard L. Delanoy
ICCV2