Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuri Yushtein
dblp:08/43
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 50% Requirements engineering and software design · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification
model checking |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Formal correctness, safety, dependability, and performance analysis of a satellite · ICSE 2012 |
Program verification › model checking
probabilistic model checking |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Formal correctness, safety, dependability, and performance analysis of a satellite · ICSE 2012 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Formal correctness, safety, dependability, and performance analysis of a satellite · ICSE 2012 |
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
software architecture analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Formal correctness, safety, dependability, and performance analysis of a satellite · ICSE 2012 |
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Formal correctness, safety, dependability, and performance analysis of a satellite · ICSE 2012 |
Embedded and real-time systems
satellite systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Formal correctness, safety, dependability, and performance analysis of a satellite · ICSE 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal modeling · 0.3fault tree analysis · 0.3AADL · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Formal correctness, safety, dependability, and performance analysis of a satelliteabstractThis paper reports on the usage of a broad palette of formal modeling and analysis techniques on a regular industrial-size design of an ultra-modern satellite platform. These efforts were carried out in parallel with the conventional software development of the satellite platform. The model itself is expressed in a formalized dialect of AADL. Its formal nature enables rigorous and automated analysis, for which the recently developed COMPASS toolset was used. The whole effort revealed numerous inconsistencies in the early design documents, and the use of formal analyses provided additional insight on discrete system behavior (comprising nearly 50 million states), on hybrid system behavior involving discrete and continuous variables, and enabled the automated generation of large fault trees (66 nodes) for safety analysis that typically are constructed by hand. The model's size pushed the computational tractability of the algorithms underlying the formal analyses, and revealed bottlenecks for future theoretical research. Additionally, the effort led to newly learned practices from which subsequent formal modeling and analysis efforts shall benefit, especially when they are injected in the conventional software development lifecycle. The case demonstrates the feasibility of fully capturing a system-level design as a single comprehensive formal model and analyze it automatically using a toolset based on (probabilistic) model checkers. Marie-Aude Esteve, Joost-Pieter Katoen, Viet Yen Nguyen, Bart Postma, Yuri Yushtein |
ICSE | 5 |
| 2008 | Supporting UML-based development of embedded systems by formal techniquesabstractWe describe an approach to support UML-based development of embedded systems by formal techniques. A subset of UML is extended with timing annotations and given a formal semantics. UML models are translated, via XMI, to the input format of formal tools, to allow timed and non-timed model checking and interactive theorem proving. Moreover, the Play-Engine tool is used to execute and analyze requirements by means of live sequence charts. We apply the approach to a part of an industrial case study, the MARS system, and report about the experiences, results and conclusions. Jozef Hooman, Hillel Kugler, Iulian Ober, Anjelika Votintseva, Yuri Yushtein |
Softw. Syst. Model. | 5 |