Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael H. Holmes

dblp:08/4897 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequencing data processing
sequence quality control
0.012001
DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal · Bioinform. 2001
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genomic data analysis
0.012001
DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal · Bioinform. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence comparison · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal
abstract
MOTIVATION: Most sequence comparison methods assume that the data being compared are trustworthy, but this is not the case with raw DNA sequences obtained from automatic sequencing machines. Nevertheless, sequence comparisons need to be done on them in order to remove vector splice sites and contaminants. This step is necessary before other genomic data processing stages can be carried out, such as fragment assembly or EST clustering. A specialized tool is therefore needed to solve this apparent dilemma. RESULTS: We have designed and implemented a program that specifically addresses the problem. This program, called LUCY, has been in use since 1998 at The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR). During this period, many rounds of experience-driven modifications were made to LUCY to improve its accuracy and its ability to deal with extremely difficult input cases. We believe we have finally obtained a useful program which strikes a delicate balance among the many issues involved in the raw sequence cleaning problem, and we wish to share it with the research community. AVAILABILITY: LUCY is available directly from TIGR (http://www.tigr.org/softlab). Academic users can download LUCY after accepting a free academic use license. Business users may need to pay a license fee to use LUCY for commercial purposes. CONTACT: Questions regarding the quality assessment module of LUCY should be directed to Michael Holmes ([email protected]). Questions regarding other aspects of LUCY should be directed to Hui-Hsien Chou ([email protected]).
Hui-Hsien Chou, Michael H. Holmes
Bioinform.2