Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Kapil Agrawal

dblp:08/5280 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Cloud and datacenter computing · 55% Distributed systems · 45%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network management and operations · 56% Network measurement and analytics · 44%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing
container orchestration
0.912025
Cooperative Graceful Degradation in Containerized Clouds · ASPLOS (1) 2025
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › resilience
graceful degradation
0.912025
Cooperative Graceful Degradation in Containerized Clouds · ASPLOS (1) 2025
Network measurement and analytics
anomaly detection
0.512021
Monitoring Cloud Service Unreachability at Scale · INFOCOM 2021
Network management and operations
network monitoring
0.512021
Monitoring Cloud Service Unreachability at Scale · INFOCOM 2021
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.312025
Cooperative Graceful Degradation in Containerized Clouds · ASPLOS (1) 2025
Network management and operations › fault management
fault diagnosis
0.112021
Monitoring Cloud Service Unreachability at Scale · INFOCOM 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gaussian model · 1.0beta-binomial model · 1.0diagonal scaling · 0.9criticality tagging · 0.9benchmarking · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Cooperative Graceful Degradation in Containerized Clouds
abstract
Cloud resilience is crucial for cloud operators and the myriad of applications that rely on the cloud. Today, we lack a mechanism that enables cloud operators to perform graceful degradation of applications while satisfying the application's availability requirements. In this paper, we put forward a vision for automated cloud resilience management with cooperative graceful degradation between applications and cloud operators. First, we investigate techniques for graceful degradation and identify an opportunity for cooperative graceful degradation in public clouds. Second, leveraging criticality tags on containers, we propose diagonal scaling---turning off non-critical containers during capacity crunch scenarios---to maximize the availability of critical services. Third, we design Phoenix, an automated cloud resilience management system that maximizes critical service availability of applications while also considering operator objectives, thereby improving the overall resilience of the infrastructure during failures. We experimentally show that the Phoenix controller running atop Kubernetes can improve critical service availability by up to 2× during large-scale failures. Phoenix can handle failures in a cluster of 100,000 nodes within 10 seconds. We also develop AdaptLab, an open-source resilience benchmarking framework that can emulate realistic cloud environments with real-world application dependency graphs.
Kapil Agrawal, Sangeetha Abdu Jyothi
ASPLOS (1)1
2021 Monitoring Cloud Service Unreachability at Scale
abstract
We consider the problem of network unreachability in a global-scale cloud-hosted service that caters to hundreds of millions of users. Even when the service itself is up, the "last mile" between where users are, and the cloud is often the weak link that could render the service unreachable. We present NetDetector, a tool for detecting network-unreachability based on measurements from a client-based HTTP-ping service. NetDetector employs two models. The first, GA (Gaussian Alerts) models temporally averaged raw success rate of the HTTP-pings as a Gaussian distribution and flags significant dips below the mean as unreachability episodes. The second, more sophisticated approach (BB, or Beta-Binomial) models the health of network connectivity as the probability of an access request succeeding, estimates health from noisy samples, and alerts based on dips in health below a client-network-specific SLO (service-level objective) derived from data. These algorithms are enhanced by a drill-down technique that identifies a more precise scope of the unreachability event. We present promising results from GA, which has been in deployment, and the experimental BB detector over a 4-month period. For instance, GA flags 49 country-level unreachability incidents, of which 42 were labelled true positives based on investigation by on-call engineers (OCEs).
Kapil Agrawal, Viral Mehta, Sundararajan Renganathan, Sreangsu Acharyya, Venkat N. Padmanabhan, Chakri Kotipalli, Liting Zhao
INFOCOM1