Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xi Wang 0028
dblp:08/5760-28
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0009-0005-8052-0157ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
communication compression |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distributed Online Convex Optimization with Compressed Communication · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distributed Online Convex Optimization with Compressed Communication · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
distributed online convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distributed Online Convex Optimization with Compressed Communication · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distributed Online Convex Optimization with Compressed Communication · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
regret bounds |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distributed Online Convex Optimization with Compressed Communication · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient descent · 0.6data compression · 0.6bandit feedback · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Distributed Online Convex Optimization with Compressed CommunicationabstractWe consider a distributed online convex optimization problem when streaming data are distributed among computing agents over a connected communication network. Since the data are high-dimensional or the network is large-scale, communication load can be a bottleneck for the efficiency of distributed algorithms. To tackle this bottleneck, we apply the state-of-art data compression scheme to the fundamental GD-based distributed online algorithms. Three algorithms with difference-compressed communication are proposed for full information feedback (DC-DOGD), one-point bandit feedback (DC-DOBD), and two-point bandit feedback (DC-DO2BD), respectively. We obtain regret bounds explicitly in terms of time horizon, compression ratio, decision dimension, agent number, and network parameters. Our algorithms are proved to be no-regret and match the same regret bounds, w.r.t. time horizon, with their uncompressed versions for both convex and strongly convex losses. Numerical experiments are given to validate the theoretical findings and illustrate that the proposed algorithms can effectively reduce the total transmitted bits for distributed online training compared with the uncompressed baseline. Zhipeng Tu, Xi Wang 0028, Yiguang Hong, Lei Wang 0059, Deming Yuan, Guodong Shi |
NeurIPS | 2 |