The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems is reshaping the landscape of information retrieval. However, the long-term effects of LLM-generated texts on retrieval systems remain underexplored, creating challenges for mitigating their impact. The effects are examined in this study, with a particular focus on the “Spiral of Silence” phenomenon, which refers to the marginalization of diverse information as certain types of content dominate, leading to a homogenized information ecosystem. To investigate this, a simulation pipeline is constructed to model the iterative introduction of LLM-generated texts into retrieval systems. Experimental results across multiple iterations reveal that as the presence of LLM-generated texts within the system grows, retrieval systems exhibit a stronger tendency to retrieve these texts. This trend, in turn, reduces the visibility of human-generated content, diminishes diversity, propagates errors, and results in a notable decline in retrieval performance. To address these challenges, we propose a Utility-Driven Multi-Objective Optimization (UMO) framework to effectively mitigate the “Spiral of Silence.” This framework employs a two-phase approach: an optimization phase, leveraging the NSGA-II algorithm to derive optimal preference weights for multiple objectives, and a memorization phase, which directly integrates these weights into the retrieval vector space without requiring additional model retraining. Experimental results demonstrate that this framework maintains stable retrieval effectiveness, improves the retrieval proportion of human-generated content, reduces the excessive influence of LLM-generated texts, and preserves information diversity, effectively mitigating the “Spiral of Silence.”

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities and are receiving increasing attention to enhance their reasoning through scaling test-time compute. However, their application in open-ended, knowledge-intensive, complex reasoning scenarios is still limited. Reasoning-oriented methods struggle to generalize to open-ended scenarios due to implicit assumptions of complete world knowledge. Meanwhile, knowledge-augmented reasoning (KAR) methods fails to address two core challenges: 1) error propagation, where errors in early steps cascade through the chain, and 2) verification bottleneck, where the explore–exploit trade-off arises in multi-branch decision processes. To overcome these limitations, we introduce ARise, a novel framework that integrates risk assessment of intermediate reasoning states with dynamic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) within a Monte Carlo tree search paradigm. This approach enables effective construction and optimization of reasoning plans across multiple maintained hypothesis branches. Experimental results show that ARise significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art KAR methods by up to 23.10%, and the latest RAG-equipped large reasoning models by up to 25.37%. Our project page is at https://opencausalab.github.io/ARise.

Entity matching (EM) is a critical step in entity resolution (ER). Recently, entity matching based on large language models (LLMs) has shown great promise. However, current LLM-based entity matching approaches typically follow a binary matching paradigm that ignores the global consistency among record relationships. In this paper, we investigate various methodologies for LLM-based entity matching that incorporate record interactions from different perspectives. Specifically, we comprehensively compare three representative strategies: matching, comparing, and selecting, and analyze their respective advantages and challenges in diverse scenarios. Based on our findings, we further design a compound entity matching framework (ComEM) that leverages the composition of multiple strategies and LLMs. ComEM benefits from the advantages of different sides and achieves improvements in both effectiveness and efficiency. Experimental results on 8 ER datasets and 10 LLMs verify the superiority of incorporating record interactions through the selecting strategy, as well as the further cost-effectiveness brought by ComEM.

Xiaoyang Chen, Ben He, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Tianshu Wang, Boxi Cao, Le Sun, Yingfei Sun. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.

Memory is one of the most essential cognitive functions serving as a repository of world knowledge and episodes of activities. In recent years, large-scale pre-trained language models have shown remarkable memorizing ability. On the contrary, vanilla neural networks without pre-training have been long observed suffering from the catastrophic forgetting problem. To investigate such a retentive-forgetful contradiction and understand the memorizing dynamic mechanism of language models, we conduct thorough experiments by controlling the target knowledge types, the learning strategies and the learning schedules. We find that: 1) Vanilla language models without pre-training are forgetful; 2) Pre-training leads to retentive language models; 3) Knowledge relevance and diversification significantly influence the memory formation. These conclusions are useful for understanding the abilities of pre-trained language models and shed light on designing and evaluating new learning and inference algorithms of language models.

Entity matching (EM) is the most critical step for entity resolution (ER). While current deep learning-based methods achieve very impressive performance on standard EM benchmarks, their real-world application performance is much frustrating. In this paper, we highlight that such the gap between reality and ideality stems from the unreasonable benchmark construction process, which is inconsistent with the nature of entity matching and therefore leads to biased evaluations of current EM approaches. To this end, we build a new EM corpus and re-construct EM benchmarks to challenge critical assumptions implicit in the previous benchmark construction process by step-wisely changing the restricted entities, balanced labels, and single-modal records in previous benchmarks into open entities, imbalanced labels, and multi-modal records in an open environment. Experimental results demonstrate that the assumptions made in the previous benchmark construction process are not coincidental with the open environment, which conceal the main challenges of the task and therefore significantly overestimate the current progress of entity matching. The constructed benchmarks and code are publicly released at https://github.com/tshu-w/ember.