Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Igor Pernek

dblp:08/7514 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0003-4637-2814ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining
0.112011
AGRA: analysis of gene ranking algorithms · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene ranking
0.112011
AGRA: analysis of gene ranking algorithms · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

text mining · 0.1ranked list comparison · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Recognizing the intensity of strength training exercises with wearable sensors
Igor Pernek, Gregorij Kurillo, Gregor Stiglic, Ruzena Bajcsy
J. Biomed. Informatics1
2013 Exercise repetition detection for resistance training based on smartphones
Igor Pernek, Karin Anna Hummel, Peter Kokol
Pers. Ubiquitous Comput.1
2011 AGRA: analysis of gene ranking algorithms
abstract
UNLABELLED: Often, the most informative genes have to be selected from different gene sets and several computer gene ranking algorithms have been developed to cope with the problem. To help researchers decide which algorithm to use, we developed the analysis of gene ranking algorithms (AGRA) system that offers a novel technique for comparing ranked lists of genes. The most important feature of AGRA is that no previous knowledge of gene ranking algorithms is needed for their comparison. Using the text mining system finding-associated concepts with text analysis. AGRA defines what we call biomedical concept space (BCS) for each gene list and offers a comparison of the gene lists in six different BCS categories. The uploaded gene lists can be compared using two different methods. In the first method, the overlap between each pair of two gene lists of BCSs is calculated. The second method offers a text field where a specific biomedical concept can be entered. AGRA searches for this concept in each gene lists' BCS, highlights the rank of the concept and offers a visual representation of concepts ranked above and below it. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Available at http://agra.fzv.uni-mb.si/, implemented in Java and running on the Glassfish server. CONTACT: [email protected].
Simon Kocbek, Rune Sætre, Gregor Stiglic, Jin-Dong Kim, Igor Pernek, Yoshimasa Tsuruoka, Peter Kokol, Sophia Ananiadou, Jun'ichi Tsujii
Bioinform.5
2010 Stability of different feature selection methods for selecting protein sequence descriptors in protein solubility classification problem
abstract
Predicting protein solubility has gained lots of intention in the recent years and several descriptors have been defined to describe proteins in these works. Therefore, different feature selection methods have been used for selecting the most important attributes. An empirical study, that aims to explain the relationship between the number of samples and stability of seven different feature selection techniques for protein datasets, is presented.
Simon Kocbek, Gregor Stiglic, Igor Pernek, Peter Kokol
CBMS3