Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Irwin Jungreis

dblp:08/9780 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics
0.112011
PhyloCSF: a comparative genomics method to distinguish protein coding and non-coding regions · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
protein coding region prediction
0.112011
PhyloCSF: a comparative genomics method to distinguish protein coding and non-coding regions · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › non-coding RNA analysis
long non-coding RNA identification
0.012011
PhyloCSF: a comparative genomics method to distinguish protein coding and non-coding regions · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology
transcriptomics
0.012011
PhyloCSF: a comparative genomics method to distinguish protein coding and non-coding regions · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

phylogenetic codon model · 0.1multispecies sequence alignment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 PhyloCSF: a comparative genomics method to distinguish protein coding and non-coding regions
abstract
MOTIVATION: As high-throughput transcriptome sequencing provides evidence for novel transcripts in many species, there is a renewed need for accurate methods to classify small genomic regions as protein coding or non-coding. We present PhyloCSF, a novel comparative genomics method that analyzes a multispecies nucleotide sequence alignment to determine whether it is likely to represent a conserved protein-coding region, based on a formal statistical comparison of phylogenetic codon models. RESULTS: We show that PhyloCSF's classification performance in 12-species Drosophila genome alignments exceeds all other methods we compared in a previous study. We anticipate that this method will be widely applicable as the transcriptomes of many additional species, tissues and subcellular compartments are sequenced, particularly in the context of ENCODE and modENCODE, and as interest grows in long non-coding RNAs, often initially recognized by their lack of protein coding potential rather than conserved RNA secondary structures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The Objective Caml source code and executables for GNU/Linux and Mac OS X are freely available at http://compbio.mit.edu/PhyloCSF CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected].
Michael F. Lin, Irwin Jungreis, Manolis Kellis
Bioinform.2