Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Min Xu 0010

dblp:09/0-10 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 66% Learning theory · 22% Representation and self-supervised learning · 12%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 34% Data mining · 26% Web and social media mining · 22%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 88% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 12%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.432011
High-dimensional Covariance Estimation Based On Gaussian Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Forest Density Estimation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Forest Density Estimation · COLT 2010
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis
document representation
0.212013
Representing documents through their readers · KDD 2013
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.212013
Representing documents through their readers · KDD 2013
Web and social media mining
social media analysis
0.212013
Representing documents through their readers · KDD 2013
Recommender systems
user modeling
0.212013
Representing documents through their readers · KDD 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
multivariate regression
0.112012
Conditional Sparse Coding and Grouped Multivariate Regression · ICML 2012
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding
0.112012
Conditional Sparse Coding and Grouped Multivariate Regression · ICML 2012
Algorithms and data structures
clustering
0.112012
Efficient Active Algorithms for Hierarchical Clustering · ICML 2012
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
hierarchical clustering
0.112012
Efficient Active Algorithms for Hierarchical Clustering · ICML 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
covariance estimation
0.112011
High-dimensional Covariance Estimation Based On Gaussian Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
gaussian graphical model
0.112011
High-dimensional Covariance Estimation Based On Gaussian Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics
0.112011
High-dimensional Covariance Estimation Based On Gaussian Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Machine learning › Learning theory
minimax analysis
0.112011
Noise Thresholds for Spectral Clustering · NIPS 2011
Data mining
clustering
0.112011
Noise Thresholds for Spectral Clustering · NIPS 2011
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering
0.112011
Noise Thresholds for Spectral Clustering · NIPS 2011
Web and social media mining
social network analysis
0.012013
Representing documents through their readers · KDD 2013
Graph algorithms and graph theory
spectral graph theory
0.012011
Noise Thresholds for Spectral Clustering · NIPS 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spectral clustering · 0.4minimax analysis · 0.4sparse coding · 0.3structured sparsity · 0.2group regularization · 0.1active learning · 0.1tree-based density estimation · 0.1kernel density estimation · 0.1forest density estimation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Representing documents through their readers
abstract
From Twitter to Facebook to Reddit, users have become accustomed to sharing the articles they read with friends or followers on their social networks. While previous work has modeled what these shared stories say about the user who shares them, the converse question remains unexplored: what can we learn about an article from the identities of its likely readers? To address this question, we model the content of news articles and blog posts by attributes of the people who are likely to share them. For example, many Twitter users describe themselves in a short profile, labeling themselves with phrases such as "vegetarian" or "liberal." By assuming that a user's labels correspond to topics in the articles he shares, we can learn a labeled dictionary from a training corpus of articles shared on Twitter. Thereafter, we can code any new document as a sparse non-negative linear combination of user labels, where we encourage correlated labels to appear together in the output via a structured sparsity penalty.
Khalid El-Arini, Min Xu 0010, Emily B. Fox, Carlos Guestrin
KDD2
2012 Efficient Active Algorithms for Hierarchical Clustering
Akshay Krishnamurthy, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Min Xu 0010, Aarti Singh
ICML3
2012 Conditional Sparse Coding and Grouped Multivariate Regression
Min Xu 0010, John D. Lafferty
ICML1
2011 Noise Thresholds for Spectral Clustering
abstract
Although spectral clustering has enjoyed considerable empirical success in machine learning, its theoretical properties are not yet fully developed. We analyze the performance of a spectral algorithm for hierarchical clustering and show that on a class of hierarchically structured similarity matrices, this algorithm can tolerate noise that grows with the number of data points while still perfectly recovering the hierarchical clusters with high probability. We additionally improve upon previous results for k-way spectral clustering to derive conditions under which spectral clustering makes no mistakes. Further, using minimax analysis, we derive tight upper and lower bounds for the clustering problem and compare the performance of spectral clustering to these information theoretic limits. We also present experiments on simulated and real world data illustrating our results.
Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Min Xu 0010, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Aarti Singh
NIPS2
2011 Forest Density Estimation
Han Liu 0001, Min Xu 0010, Haijie Gu, Anupam Gupta 0001, John D. Lafferty, Larry A. Wasserman
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2011 High-dimensional Covariance Estimation Based On Gaussian Graphical Models
Shuheng Zhou 0002, Philipp Rütimann, Min Xu 0010, Peter Bühlmann
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2010 Forest Density Estimation
Anupam Gupta 0001, John D. Lafferty, Han Liu 0001, Larry A. Wasserman, Min Xu 0010
COLT5