Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Min Xu 0010
dblp:09/0-10
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 66% Learning theory · 22% Representation and self-supervised learning · 12% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 34% Data mining · 26% Web and social media mining · 22% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 88% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 12% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.4 | 3 | 2011 | High-dimensional Covariance Estimation Based On Gaussian Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 Forest Density Estimation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 Forest Density Estimation · COLT 2010 |
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis
document representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Representing documents through their readers · KDD 2013 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Representing documents through their readers · KDD 2013 |
Web and social media mining
social media analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Representing documents through their readers · KDD 2013 |
Recommender systems
user modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Representing documents through their readers · KDD 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
multivariate regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Conditional Sparse Coding and Grouped Multivariate Regression · ICML 2012 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Conditional Sparse Coding and Grouped Multivariate Regression · ICML 2012 |
Algorithms and data structures
clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Efficient Active Algorithms for Hierarchical Clustering · ICML 2012 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
hierarchical clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Efficient Active Algorithms for Hierarchical Clustering · ICML 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
covariance estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | High-dimensional Covariance Estimation Based On Gaussian Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
gaussian graphical model |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | High-dimensional Covariance Estimation Based On Gaussian Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | High-dimensional Covariance Estimation Based On Gaussian Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
minimax analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Noise Thresholds for Spectral Clustering · NIPS 2011 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Noise Thresholds for Spectral Clustering · NIPS 2011 |
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Noise Thresholds for Spectral Clustering · NIPS 2011 |
Web and social media mining
social network analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Representing documents through their readers · KDD 2013 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
spectral graph theory |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Noise Thresholds for Spectral Clustering · NIPS 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral clustering · 0.4minimax analysis · 0.4sparse coding · 0.3structured sparsity · 0.2group regularization · 0.1active learning · 0.1tree-based density estimation · 0.1kernel density estimation · 0.1forest density estimation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Representing documents through their readersabstractFrom Twitter to Facebook to Reddit, users have become accustomed to sharing the articles they read with friends or followers on their social networks. While previous work has modeled what these shared stories say about the user who shares them, the converse question remains unexplored: what can we learn about an article from the identities of its likely readers? To address this question, we model the content of news articles and blog posts by attributes of the people who are likely to share them. For example, many Twitter users describe themselves in a short profile, labeling themselves with phrases such as "vegetarian" or "liberal." By assuming that a user's labels correspond to topics in the articles he shares, we can learn a labeled dictionary from a training corpus of articles shared on Twitter. Thereafter, we can code any new document as a sparse non-negative linear combination of user labels, where we encourage correlated labels to appear together in the output via a structured sparsity penalty. Khalid El-Arini, Min Xu 0010, Emily B. Fox, Carlos Guestrin |
KDD | 2 |
| 2012 | Efficient Active Algorithms for Hierarchical Clustering
Akshay Krishnamurthy, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Min Xu 0010, Aarti Singh |
ICML | 3 |
| 2012 | Conditional Sparse Coding and Grouped Multivariate Regression
Min Xu 0010, John D. Lafferty |
ICML | 1 |
| 2011 | Noise Thresholds for Spectral ClusteringabstractAlthough spectral clustering has enjoyed considerable empirical success in machine learning, its theoretical properties are not yet fully developed. We analyze the performance of a spectral algorithm for hierarchical clustering and show that on a class of hierarchically structured similarity matrices, this algorithm can tolerate noise that grows with the number of data points while still perfectly recovering the hierarchical clusters with high probability. We additionally improve upon previous results for k-way spectral clustering to derive conditions under which spectral clustering makes no mistakes. Further, using minimax analysis, we derive tight upper and lower bounds for the clustering problem and compare the performance of spectral clustering to these information theoretic limits. We also present experiments on simulated and real world data illustrating our results. Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Min Xu 0010, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Aarti Singh |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2011 | Forest Density Estimation
Han Liu 0001, Min Xu 0010, Haijie Gu, Anupam Gupta 0001, John D. Lafferty, Larry A. Wasserman |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2011 | High-dimensional Covariance Estimation Based On Gaussian Graphical Models
Shuheng Zhou 0002, Philipp Rütimann, Min Xu 0010, Peter Bühlmann |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2010 | Forest Density Estimation
Anupam Gupta 0001, John D. Lafferty, Han Liu 0001, Larry A. Wasserman, Min Xu 0010 |
COLT | 5 |