Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhiwei Guo 0001

dblp:09/1326-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0004-5569-8925ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 67% Information retrieval · 33%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Video understanding and tracking · 77% Language models and text generation · 23%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › fact-checking
evidence verification
0.812024
Towards Rumor Detection With Multi-Granularity Evidences: A Dataset and Benchmark · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024
Web and social media mining
misinformation detection
0.812024
Towards Rumor Detection With Multi-Granularity Evidences: A Dataset and Benchmark · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024
Web and social media mining › misinformation detection
rumor detection
0.812024
Towards Rumor Detection With Multi-Granularity Evidences: A Dataset and Benchmark · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
event detection
0.812024
Towards Temporal Event Detection: A Dataset, Benchmarks and Challenges · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2024
Empirical software engineering › benchmarking
benchmark dataset construction
0.212024
Towards Temporal Event Detection: A Dataset, Benchmarks and Challenges · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal deep learning · 2.3large language model · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Cross-Modal Attention Network for Detecting Multimodal Misinformation From Multiple Platforms
abstract
Misinformation detection in short videos on social media has become a pressing issue due to its popularity. However, datasets for misinformation detection are limited in terms of modality and sources, hindering the development of effective detection methods. In this article, we introduce a novel dataset denoted the multiplatform multimodal misinformation (3M) dataset. Our dataset is collected specifically to investigate and address misinformation in a multimodal context. A total of 17 352 videos were collected from two prominent social media platforms, namely TikTok and Weibo. The 3M dataset covers 30 different topics, such as sports, health, news, and art, providing a diverse range of content for analysis. We propose a novel approach named cross-modal attention misinformation detection (CAMD) for effectively detecting and addressing multimodal misinformation. CAMD leverages the cross-modal attention module to facilitate effective information exchange and fusion between modalities by learning the correlations and weights among them. The cross-modal attention module is capable of learning multilevel modality correlations, focuses primarily on the interaction between multimodal sequences across different time steps, and simultaneously adjusts the information from the source modality based on the information of the target modality. Extensive experiments on the 3M dataset show that the proposed method achieves state-of- the-art performance. Specifically, CAMD achieves accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall values of 76.86%, 58.05%, 87.86%, and 58.70%, respectively, on the 3M dataset.
Zhiwei Guo 0001, Yang Li 0201, Zhenguo Yang, Xiaoping Li 0001, Lap-Kei Lee, Qing Li 0001, Wenyin Liu
IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst.1
2024 Towards Rumor Detection With Multi-Granularity Evidences: A Dataset and Benchmark
abstract
Social media serves as a real-time collecting and disseminating center of users’ ideas, opinions, and experiences. The deliberate disinformation and rumors propagate rapidly online due to their exaggerated facts, controversial opinions, divisive perspectives, and stunning expressions. Rumor detection approaches typically use social media posts with rumor or non-rumor labels for training and testing without disclosing the rationale behind decision-makings. On one hand, collecting evidence data to verify claims relies on expert efforts. On the other hand, verifying the truthfulness of confusing claims with distracting and lengthy evidences is still challenging. In this paper, we contribute a rumor detection dataset with multi-granularity evidences, denoted as the RD-E dataset, which includes response, fact-check, article, sourcing data and generated evidence by large language models, supporting models to verify the truthfulness of claims on social media. A number of 32,892 claims from 4,525 public individuals and organizations are annotated to 6 kinds of labels, including true, mostly true, half true, mostly false, false, pants on fire, covering a wide range of topics, e.g., politics, economy, society, technology, and health. In the experiments, seven rumor detection models have been investigated and customized on four predefined subtasks for comparisons.
Zhenguo Yang, Jiajie Lin, Zhiwei Guo 0001, Yang Li 0201, Xiaoping Li 0001, Qing Li 0001, Wenyin Liu
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.3
2024 Towards Temporal Event Detection: A Dataset, Benchmarks and Challenges
abstract
The availability of datasets annotated with verified events by the public is a necessary prerequisite for unleashing the potential of multimodal deep learning for news event detection. Publicly available datasets are either incompletely annotated due to expensive cost, or ignore the verifiability of event labels, which are susceptible to bias and errors introduced by a limited number of annotators. In this article, we provide a YouTube dataset labelled by real-world news events that can be verified by Wikipedia-like crowd sourcing platforms, with the target of advancing temporal event detection. The events in our dataset cover a wide range of event topics including public security, natural disasters, elections, sports, and entertainment events, etc. In the dataset, each sample is labelled with real-world event that is verifiable by the public. We extensively evaluate the performance of 13 state-of-the-art algorithms on our dataset in a temporal manner, involving the multiple relationships between training and testing event labels, and provide a thorough analysis of the findings.
Zhenguo Yang, Zhuopan Yang, Zhiwei Guo 0001, Zehang Lin, Haizhong Zhu, Qing Li 0001, Wenyin Liu
IEEE Trans. Multim.3
2023 Meta Perturbation Generation Network for Text-Based CAPTCHA
Zhuoting Wu, Zhiwei Guo 0001, Jiuxiang You, Zhenguo Yang, Qing Li 0001, Wenyin Liu
SecureComm (1)2
2022 Towards Temporal Event Detection: A Dataset and Benchmarks
abstract
In this paper, we present a new dataset with the target of advancing temporal real-world event detection from video-sharing social media. The collected temporal event dataset (TED) has certain characteristics. 1) Certainty of event labels that can be recognized as real-world happening. 2) Wide range of event categories covering public security, natural disasters, elections, sports and entertainment events, etc. 3) High overlap among event topics ensuring the difficulties in distinguishing the labels. 4) Multiple data modalities involving textual, acoustic, and visual information, etc. More specifically, two scenarios are defined based on the close or open domains, i.e., temporal event detection without/with new events, denoted as TED-W and TED-N, respectively. For comparisons, a few benchmarks are investigated on the two scenarios with the dataset.
Zhenguo Yang, Haizhong Zhu, Zhiwei Guo 0001, Zehang Lin, Qing Li 0001, Wenyin Liu
ICME3