Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Franco Civello

dblp:09/1778 · also Francesco R. Civello · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
model transformation		 0.011993
Roles for Composite Objects in Object-Oriented Analysis and Design · OOPSLA 1993
Requirements engineering and software design
object-oriented analysis and design		 0.011993
Roles for Composite Objects in Object-Oriented Analysis and Design · OOPSLA 1993
Embedded and real-time systems
embedded system design		 0.011993
Roles for Composite Objects in Object-Oriented Analysis and Design · OOPSLA 1993
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1993 Roles for Composite Objects in Object-Oriented Analysis and Design
abstract
A method is presented for using composite objects which separates their role and meaning as models of relations between problem-domain concepts from their role and meaning as models of hierarchical sof'twarc structures.The meaning of composite objects is analysed in terms of connections bctwccn real-world concepts in object-oriented analysis and bctwccn software objects in object-oriented design.By capturing the designer's rationale for model transformation, the resulting models arc casicr to understand and maintain.An embedded systems example illustrates the approach.
Franco Civello
 OOPSLA1