Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amit Chandak

dblp:09/2728 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Routing and switching · 61% Optical networks · 30% Network management and operations · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching › fault-tolerant routing
backup path routing
0.112008
Dual-link failure resiliency through backup link mutual exclusion · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2008
Routing and switching
link failure recovery
0.112008
Dual-link failure resiliency through backup link mutual exclusion · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2008
Optical networks › network survivability
survivable optical networks
0.112008
Dual-link failure resiliency through backup link mutual exclusion · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2008
Network management and operations › network robustness
fault tolerance
0.012008
Dual-link failure resiliency through backup link mutual exclusion · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

backup link mutual exclusion · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Dual-link failure resiliency through backup link mutual exclusion
Srinivasan Ramasubramanian, Amit Chandak
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.2
2005 Dual-link failure resiliency through backup link mutual exclusion
abstract
One of the strategies to recover from dual-link failures is to employ link protection for the two failed links independently which requires that two links may not use each other in their backup paths if they may fail simultaneously. Such a requirement is referred to as backup link mutual exclusion (BLME) constraint and the problem of identifying a backup path for every link that satisfies the above requirement is referred to as the BLME problem. This paper explores the BLME problem in depth by: (1) formulating the backup path selection as an integer linear program; and (2) developing a pseudo-polynomial time approximation algorithm based on minimum cost path routing. The ILP formulation and heuristic are applied to six networks and their performance is compared to approaches that assume precise knowledge of dual-link failure. The heuristic approach is shown to obtain feasible solutions that are resilient to most dual-link failures, although the backup path lengths may be significantly higher than optimal. In addition, the paper demonstrates the significance of the knowledge of failure location by illustrating that network with higher connectivity may require lesser capacity than one with a lower connectivity to recover from arbitrary dual-link failures.
Amit Chandak, Srinivasan Ramasubramanian
BROADNETS1