Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
K. R. Poland
dblp:09/3622
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Authentication and access control · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Authentication and access control › access control policy
separation of duty |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Some Conundrums Concerning Separation of Duty · S&P 1990 |
Authentication and access control › security policy
integrity policy |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Some Conundrums Concerning Separation of Duty · S&P 1990 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | Some Conundrums Concerning Separation of DutyabstractAn examination is made of questions concerning commercial computer security integrity policies. An example is given of a dynamic separation of duty policy which cannot be implemented by mechanisms based on TCSEC based mechanisms alone, yet occurs in the real commercial world and can be implemented efficiently in practice. A commercial computer security product in wide use for ensuring the integrity of financial transactions is presented. It is shown that it implements a well-defined and sensible integrity policy that includes separation of duty, yet fails to meet either the TCSEC or the D.D. Clark and D.R. Wilson (1987) rules.> Michael J. Nash, K. R. Poland |
S&P | 2 |