EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert T. Lynch Jr.
dblp:09/3710
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Storage systems · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Coding theory · 100% | |
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Physical-layer communications · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › optical storage
magnetooptical recording |
0.0 | 2 | 1992 | Channels and Codes for Magnetooptical Recording · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1992 Trellis Codes for Partial-Response Magnetooptical Direct Overwrite Recording · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1992 |
Physical-layer communications › signal detection
data detection |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Channels and Codes for Magnetooptical Recording · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1992 |
Storage systems › optical storage
optical recording |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Trellis Codes for Partial-Response Magnetooptical Direct Overwrite Recording · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1992 |
Storage systems
optical storage |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Channels and Codes for Magnetooptical Recording · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1992 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
coded modulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Channels and Codes for Magnetooptical Recording · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1992 |
Coding theory › constrained coding
runlength-limited codes |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Channels and Codes for Magnetooptical Recording · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1992 |
Coding theory
trellis codes |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Trellis Codes for Partial-Response Magnetooptical Direct Overwrite Recording · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1992 |
Physical-layer communications › channel modeling › channel with memory
partial-response channel |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Trellis Codes for Partial-Response Magnetooptical Direct Overwrite Recording · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1992 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
maximum-likelihood sequence detection · 0.0euclidean distance analysis · 0.0channel modeling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1992 | Trellis Codes for Partial-Response Magnetooptical Direct Overwrite RecordingabstractThe authors present conditions on the error sequences between channel input sequences which guarantee certain lower bounds on the free Euclidian distance at the output of a partial-response (PR) class I or II channel. From these expressions, trellis codes are derived which improve performance of binary signaling over noisy PR channels with reduced complexity maximum-likelihood sequence detection. They are shown to be compatible with the input restriction caused by the magnetooptical resonant coil direct overwrite recording scheme. The codes achieve high signal-to-noise ratio coding gains of 3 dB (on PR class I) and 2.2 dB (on PR class II) with rates as close to, but strictly less than, the capacity of the initial input restriction as desired. The performance of these codes is analyzed with an optical channel simulation system which shows that one code has the rare but highly desirable property that its maximum-likelihood sequence detector (MLSD) is less complex than the MLSD of the reference system and still achieves an error rate performance gain of 1.8 dB.> Reinhold Häb-Umbach, Robert T. Lynch Jr. |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 2 |
| 1992 | Channels and Codes for Magnetooptical RecordingabstractThe author outlines the technology used in the optical recording channel concentrating on magnetooptical recording and describes some of the major formats, codes, and data detection methods which are being developed. A sophisticated model of the optical recording channel was used as a way to make fair comparisons of these candidates, without skewing the results because of different disk or drive quality, degrees of hardware development, test procedures, etc. The author describes strengths and weaknesses of some of the leading contenders for current and future optical recording channels.> Robert T. Lynch Jr. |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 1 |