Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Medha Atre

dblp:09/5062 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Query processing and optimization · 63% Graph data management · 26% Data models and query languages · 11%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization › query optimization › graph query optimization
SPARQL query optimization
0.822022
The Case of SPARQL UNION, FILTER and DISTINCT · WWW 2022
Left Bit Right: For SPARQL Join Queries with OPTIONAL Patterns (Left-outer-joins) · SIGMOD Conference 2015
Query processing and optimization › query optimization
join ordering
0.212015
Left Bit Right: For SPARQL Join Queries with OPTIONAL Patterns (Left-outer-joins) · SIGMOD Conference 2015
Graph data management › RDF data management
RDF query processing
0.222015
Matrix "Bit" loaded: a scalable lightweight join query processor for RDF data · WWW 2010
Left Bit Right: For SPARQL Join Queries with OPTIONAL Patterns (Left-outer-joins) · SIGMOD Conference 2015
Data models and query languages › RDF query language
SPARQL
0.212022
The Case of SPARQL UNION, FILTER and DISTINCT · WWW 2022
Graph data management
RDF data management
0.122010
Visualizing large-scale RDF data using Subsets, Summaries, and Sampling in Oracle · ICDE 2010
Matrix "Bit" loaded: a scalable lightweight join query processor for RDF data · WWW 2010
Graph data management › graph indexing
RDF indexing
0.112010
Matrix "Bit" loaded: a scalable lightweight join query processor for RDF data · WWW 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

triple pattern reordering · 0.6query rewriting · 0.6merge join · 0.1bitmap indexing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 The Case of SPARQL UNION, FILTER and DISTINCT
abstract
SPARQL’s Basic Graph Pattern (BGP) queries are well-researched for query optimisation and RDF indexing techniques. They resemble SQL inner joins and benefit from reorderability of triple patterns in their performance optimisation. But other components of SPARQL such as OPTIONAL, UNION, FILTER, DISTINCT pose more challenges, as they are part of the SPARQL recursive grammar and impose restrictions on the reorderability of triple patterns. These components are important because they help in querying the semi-structured data as opposed to the strictly structured relational data with a stringent schema. In this paper, we use previously published optimisation techniques for BGP-OPTIONAL queries as primitives, and show how they can be used for SPARQL queries with any intermix of UNION, FILTER, and DISTINCT clauses. We mainly focus on the structural aspects of these queries, identify UNION, FILTER, and DISTINCT queries that can use these BGP-OPTIONAL optimisation techniques, and extend some of the previously published theoretical results.
Medha Atre
WWW1
2016 Quark-X: An Efficient Top-K Processing Framework for RDF Quad Stores
abstract
There is a growing trend towards enriching the RDF content from its classical Subject-Predicate-Object triple form to an annotated representation which can model richer relationships such as including fact provenance, fact confidence, higher-order relationships and so on. One of the recommended ways to achieve this is to use reification and represent it as N-Quads "or simply quads" where an additional identifier is associated with the entire RDF statement which can then be used to add further annotations. A typical use of such annotations is to have quantifiable confidence values to be attached to facts. In such settings, it is important to support efficient top-k queries, typically over user-defined ranking functions containing sentence level confidence values in addition to other quantifiable values in the database. In this paper, we present Quark-X, an RDF-store and SPARQL processing system for reified RDF data represented in the form of quads. This paper presents the overall architecture of our system -- illustrating the modifications which need to be made to a native quad store for it to process top-k queries. In Quark-X, we propose indexing and query processing techniques for making top-k querying efficient. In addition, we present the results of a comprehensive empirical evaluation of our system over Yago2S and DBpedia datasets. Our performance study shows that the proposed method achieves one to two order of magnitude speed-up over baseline solutions.
Jyoti Leeka, Srikanta J. Bedathur, Debajyoti Bera, Medha Atre
CIKM4
2015 Left Bit Right: For SPARQL Join Queries with OPTIONAL Patterns (Left-outer-joins)
abstract
SPARQL basic graph pattern (BGP) (a.k.a. SQL inner-join) query optimization is a well researched area. However, optimization of OPTIONAL pattern queries (a.k.a. SQL left-outer-joins) poses additional challenges, due to the restrictions on the reordering of left-outer-joins. The occurrence of such queries tends to be as high as 50% of the total queries (e.g., DBPedia query logs).
Medha Atre
SIGMOD Conference1
2010 Visualizing large-scale RDF data using Subsets, Summaries, and Sampling in Oracle
abstract
The paper addresses the problem of visualizing large scale RDF data via a 3-S approach, namely, by using, (1) Subsets: to present only relevant data for visualisation; both static and dynamic subsets can be specified, (2) Summaries: to capture the essence of RDF data being viewed; summarized data can be expanded on demand thereby allowing users to create hybrid (summary-detail) fisheye views of RDF data, and (3) Sampling: to further optimize visualization of large-scale data where a representative sample suffices. The visualization scheme works with both asserted and inferred triples (generated using RDF(S) and OWL semantics). This scheme is implemented in Oracle by developing a plug-in for the Cytoscape graph visualization tool, which uses functions defined in a Oracle PL/SQL package, to provide fast and optimized access to Oracle Semantic Store containing RDF data. Interactive visualization of a synthesized RDF data set (LUBM 1 million triples), two native RDF datasets (Wikipedia 47 million triples and UniProt 700 million triples), and an OWL ontology (eClassOwl with a large class hierarchy including over 25,000 OWL classes, 5,000 properties, and 400,000 class-properties) demonstrates the effectiveness of our visualization scheme.
Seema Sundara, Medha Atre, Vladimir Kolovski, Souripriya Das, Eugene Inseok Chong, Jagannathan Srinivasan
ICDE2
2010 Matrix "Bit" loaded: a scalable lightweight join query processor for RDF data
abstract
The Semantic Web community, until now, has used traditional database systems for the storage and querying of RDF data. The SPARQL query language also closely follows SQL syntax. As a natural consequence, most of the SPARQL query processing techniques are based on database query processing and optimization techniques. For SPARQL join query optimization, previous works like RDF-3X and Hexastore have proposed to use 6-way indexes on the RDF data. Although these indexes speed up merge-joins by orders of magnitude, for complex join queries generating large intermediate join results, the scalability of the query processor still remains a challenge.
Medha Atre, Vineet Chaoji, Mohammed J. Zaki, James A. Hendler
WWW1
2010 Scalable reduction of large datasets to interesting subsets
Gregory Todd Williams, Jesse Weaver, Medha Atre, James A. Hendler
J. Web Semant.3