Attacks on the software supply chain have shed light on the fragility and importance of ensuring the security and integrity of this vital ecosystem. Addressing the technical and social challenges to building trustworthy software (including AI applications) requires innovative solutions and an interdisciplinary approach. The Workshop on Software Supply Chain Offensive Research and Ecosystem Defenses (SCORED) is the leading venue for academics, industry practitioners, and policymakers to present and discuss security vulnerabilities, novel defenses against attacks, deployment experiences, adoption requirements and best practices in the software supply chain. The complete SCORED '25 workshop proceedings are available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3733827

Rust offers both safety guarantees and high performance. Thus, it has gained significant popularity in the industry. To extend its capability as a system programming language, Rust allows unsafe blocks where the execution has low-level controls but loses the safety guarantees. In principle, unsafe blocks should only be used when necessary. However, preliminary evidence shows a different situation. This paper aims to establish a deeper view of this matter and bring endeavors toward improvement.

Rust is a young systems programming language, but it has gained tremendous popularity thanks to its assurance of memory safety. However, the performance of Rust has been less systematically understood, although many people are claiming that Rust is comparable to C/C++ regarding efficiency.