Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Hendrik vom Lehn

dblp:09/7882 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network performance modeling · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network performance modeling
network emulation		 0.112011
SliceTime: A Platform for Scalable and Accurate Network Emulation · NSDI 2011
Distributed systems › experimental testbed
distributed system emulation		 0.112011
SliceTime: A Platform for Scalable and Accurate Network Emulation · NSDI 2011
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 SliceTime: A Platform for Scalable and Accurate Network Emulation
Elias Weingärtner, Florian Schmidt 0002, Hendrik vom Lehn, Tobias Heer, Klaus Wehrle
 NSDI3
2009 A Performance Comparison of Recent Network Simulators
abstract
A widespread methodology for performance analysis in the field of communication systems engineering is network simulation. While ns-2 has established itself as virtually the standard network simulation tool, other network simulators have gained more and more attention during the last years. In this paper, we briefly survey new developments in the field of network simulation and conduct a performance comparison study by implementing an identical simulation set-up in five simulators, namely ns-2, OMNet++, ns-3, SimPy and JiST/SWANS. Our results reveal large differences according to both run-time performance and memory usage.
Elias Weingärtner, Hendrik vom Lehn, Klaus Wehrle
 ICC2