Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eugen Kafer
dblp:09/8370
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Video understanding and tracking · 38% Motion planning and robot control · 38% Autonomous driving · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
collision detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Recognition of situation classes at road intersections · ICRA 2010 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › activity recognition
situation recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Recognition of situation classes at road intersections · ICRA 2010 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › state estimation
trajectory estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Recognition of situation classes at road intersections · ICRA 2010 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
trajectory prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Recognition of situation classes at road intersections · ICRA 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic fusion · 0.1polynomial classifier · 0.1differential GPS · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Recognition and Prediction of Situations in Urban Traffic ScenariosabstractThe recognition and prediction of intersection situations and an accompanying threat assessment are an indispensable skill of future driver assistance systems. This study focuses on the recognition of situations involving two vehicles at intersections. For each vehicle, a set of possible future motion trajectories is estimated and rated based on a motion database for a time interval of 2-4 s ahead. Possible situations involving two vehicles are generated by a pairwise combination of these individual motion trajectories. An interaction model based on the mutual visibility of the vehicles and the assumption that a driver will attempt to avoid a collision is used to rate possible situations. The correspondingly favoured situations are classified with a probabilistic framework. The proposed method is evaluated on a real-world differential GPS data set acquired during a test drive of about 10 km, including three road intersections. Our method is typically able to recognise the situation correctly about 1.5-3 s before the last vehicle has passed its minimum distance to the centre of the intersection. Eugen Kafer, Christoph Hermes, Christian Wöhler, Franz Kummert, Helge J. Ritter |
ICPR | 1 |
| 2010 | Recognition of situation classes at road intersectionsabstractThe recognition and prediction of situations is an indispensable skill of future driver assistance systems. This study focuses on the recognition of situations involving two vehicles at intersections. For each vehicle, a set of possible future motion trajectories is estimated and rated based on a motion database for a time interval of 2-4 seconds ahead. Realistic situations are generated by a pairwise combination of these individual motion trajectories and classified according to nine categories with a polynomial classifier. In the proposed framework, situations are penalised for which the time to collision significantly exceeds the typical human reaction time. The correspondingly favoured situations are combined by a probabilistic framework, resulting in a more reliable situation recognition and collision detection than obtained based on independent motion hypotheses. The proposed method is evaluated on a real-world differential GPS data set acquired during a test drive of 10 km, including three road intersections. Our method is typically able to recognise the situation correctly about 1-2 seconds before the distance to the intersection centre becomes minimal. Eugen Kafer, Christoph Hermes, Christian Wöhler, Helge J. Ritter, Franz Kummert |
ICRA | 1 |