Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Ilan Dimnik

dblp:09/8708 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › iterative decoding
belief propagation decoding
0.112009
Improved random redundant iterative HDPC decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2009
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
iterative decoding
0.112009
Improved random redundant iterative HDPC decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2009
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › iterative decoding
soft-input soft-output decoding
0.112009
Improved random redundant iterative HDPC decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2009
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
cyclic block code
0.012009
Improved random redundant iterative HDPC decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random permutation · 0.1maximum likelihood · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Improved random redundant iterative HDPC decoding
abstract
An iterative algorithm for soft-input soft-output (SISO) decoding of classical algebraic cyclic block codes is presented below. Inspired by other approaches for high performance belief propagation (BP) decoding, this algorithm requires up to 10 times less computational complexity than other methods that achieve similar performance. By utilizing multiple BP decoders, and using random permutation taken from the permutation group of the code, this algorithm reaches near maximum likelihood performance. A computational complexity comparison of the proposed algorithm versus other methods is presented as well. This includes complexity versus performance analysis, allowing one to trade between the former and the latter, according to ones needs.
Ilan Dimnik, Yair Be'ery
IEEE Trans. Commun.1