Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Schiftner

dblp:09/92 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
5 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling › parametric modeling › spline surfaces
b-spline surface
0.412019
Optimizing B-spline surfaces for developability and paneling architectural freeform surfaces · Comput. Aided Des. 2019
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling › surface geometry
developable surface
0.412019
Optimizing B-spline surfaces for developability and paneling architectural freeform surfaces · Comput. Aided Des. 2019
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling › architectural geometry
panelization
0.222019
Optimizing B-spline surfaces for developability and paneling architectural freeform surfaces · Comput. Aided Des. 2019
Geodesic patterns · ACM Trans. Graph. 2010
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling › architectural geometry
freeform surface paneling
0.112010
Paneling architectural freeform surfaces · ACM Trans. Graph. 2010
Geometric modeling and processing › surface processing
surface segmentation
0.112010
Geodesic patterns · ACM Trans. Graph. 2010
Geometric modeling and processing
mesh generation
0.112009
Packing circles and spheres on surfaces · ACM Trans. Graph. 2009
Geometric modeling and processing
mesh processing
0.112009
Packing circles and spheres on surfaces · ACM Trans. Graph. 2009
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling
architectural geometry
0.012009
Packing circles and spheres on surfaces · ACM Trans. Graph. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization · 0.4level set formulation · 0.1geodesic vector fields · 0.1discrete-continuous optimization · 0.16-dimensional metric space · 0.1discrete differential geometry · 0.1conformal geometry · 0.1b-spline optimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Optimizing B-spline surfaces for developability and paneling architectural freeform surfaces
Konstantinos Gavriil, Alexander Schiftner, Helmut Pottmann
Comput. Aided Des.2
2010 Designing Quad-dominant Meshes with Planar Faces
abstract
Abstract We study the combined problem of approximating a surface by a quad mesh (or quad‐dominant mesh) which on the one hand has planar faces, and which on the other hand is aesthetically pleasing and has evenly spaced vertices. This work is motivated by applications in freeform architecture and leads to a discussion of fields of conjugate directions in surfaces, their singularities and indices, their optimization and their interactive modeling. The actual meshing is performed by means of a level set method which is capable of handling combinatorial singularities, and which can deal with planarity, smoothness, and spacing issues.
Mirko Zadravec, Alexander Schiftner, Johannes Wallner 0001
Comput. Graph. Forum2
2010 Paneling architectural freeform surfaces
abstract
The emergence of large-scale freeform shapes in architecture poses big challenges to the fabrication of such structures. A key problem is the approximation of the design surface by a union of patches, so-called panels, that can be manufactured with a selected technology at reasonable cost, while meeting the design intent and achieving the desired aesthetic quality of panel layout and surface smoothness. The production of curved panels is mostly based on molds. Since the cost of mold fabrication often dominates the panel cost, there is strong incentive to use the same mold for multiple panels. We cast the major practical requirements for architectural surface paneling, including mold reuse, into a global optimization framework that interleaves discrete and continuous optimization steps to minimize production cost while meeting user-specified quality constraints. The search space for optimization is mainly generated through controlled deviation from the design surface and tolerances on positional and normal continuity between neighboring panels. A novel 6-dimensional metric space allows us to quickly compute approximate inter-panel distances, which dramatically improves the performance of the optimization and enables the handling of complex arrangements with thousands of panels. The practical relevance of our system is demonstrated by paneling solutions for real, cutting-edge architectural freeform design projects.
Michael Eigensatz, Martin Kilian, Alexander Schiftner, Niloy J. Mitra, Helmut Pottmann, Mark Pauly
ACM Trans. Graph.3
2010 Geodesic patterns
abstract
Geodesic curves in surfaces are not only minimizers of distance, but they are also the curves of zero geodesic (sideways) curvature. It turns out that this property makes patterns of geodesics the basic geometric entity when dealing with the cladding of a freeform surface with wooden panels which do not bend sideways. Likewise a geodesic is the favored shape of timber support elements in freeform architecture, for reasons of manufacturing and statics. Both problem areas are fundamental in freeform architecture, but so far only experimental solutions have been available. This paper provides a systematic treatment and shows how to design geodesic patterns in different ways: The evolution of geodesic curves is good for local studies and simple patterns; the level set formulation can deal with the global layout of multiple patterns of geodesics; finally geodesic vector fields allow us to interactively model geodesic patterns and perform surface segmentation into panelizable parts.
Helmut Pottmann, Qixing Huang, Bailin Deng, Alexander Schiftner, Martin Kilian, Leonidas J. Guibas, Johannes Wallner 0001
ACM Trans. Graph.4
2009 Packing circles and spheres on surfaces
abstract
Inspired by freeform designs in architecture which involve circles and spheres, we introduce a new kind of triangle mesh whose faces' incircles form a packing. As it turns out, such meshes have a rich geometry and allow us to cover surfaces with circle patterns, sphere packings, approximate circle packings, hexagonal meshes which carry a torsion-free support structure, hybrid tri-hex meshes, and others. We show how triangle meshes can be optimized so as to have the incircle packing property. We explain their relation to conformal geometry and implications on solvability of optimization. The examples we give confirm that this kind of meshes is a rich source of geometric structures relevant to architectural geometry.
Alexander Schiftner, Mathias Höbinger, Johannes Wallner 0001, Helmut Pottmann
ACM Trans. Graph.1
2008 Freeform surfaces from single curved panels
abstract
Motivated by applications in architecture and manufacturing, we discuss the problem of covering a freeform surface by single curved panels. This leads to the new concept of semi-discrete surface representation, which constitutes a link between smooth and discrete surfaces. The basic entity we are working with is the developable strip model. It is the semi-discrete equivalent of a quad mesh with planar faces, or a conjugate parametrization of a smooth surface. We present a B-spline based optimization framework for efficient computing with D-strip models. In particular we study conical and circular models, which semi-discretize the network of principal curvature lines, and which enjoy elegant geometric properties. Together with geodesic models and cylindrical models they offer a rich source of solutions for surface panelization problems.
Helmut Pottmann, Alexander Schiftner, Pengbo Bo, Heinz Schmiedhofer, Wenping Wang 0001, Niccolo Baldassini, Johannes Wallner 0001
ACM Trans. Graph.2