An important aspect of High-Performance Computing (HPC) system design is the choice of main memory capacity. This choice becomes increasingly important now that 3D-stacked memories are entering the market. Compared with conventional Dual In-line Memory Modules (DIMMs), 3D memory chiplets provide better performance and energy efficiency but lower memory capacities. Therefore, the adoption of 3D-stacked memories in the HPC domain depends on whether we can find use cases that require much less memory than is available now. This study analyzes the memory capacity requirements of important HPC benchmarks and applications. We find that the High-Performance Conjugate Gradients (HPCG) benchmark could be an important success story for 3D-stacked memories in HPC, but High-Performance Linpack (HPL) is likely to be constrained by 3D memory capacity. The study also emphasizes that the analysis of memory footprints of production HPC applications is complex and that it requires an understanding of application scalability and target category, i.e., whether the users target capability or capacity computing. The results show that most of the HPC applications under study have per-core memory footprints in the range of hundreds of megabytes, but we also detect applications and use cases that require gigabytes per core. Overall, the study identifies the HPC applications and use cases with memory footprints that could be provided by 3D-stacked memory chiplets, making a first step toward adoption of this novel technology in the HPC domain.

Characterization of high-performance computing applications often has to be done without access to the source code. Computer architects, therefore, have a narrowed choice of instrumentation tools. Moreover, potentially large amount of collected data can prohibit creating a full time stamped event trace and analyzing it post-mortem. This paper describes Limpio -- a Light weight MPI instrumentation framework, that allows dynamic instrumentation of user-selected MPI calls, and customization of data gathering, analysis and visualization.

The performance of HPC applications is often bounded by the underlying memory system's performance. The trend of increasing the number of cores on a chip imposes even higher memory bandwidth and capacity requirements. The limitations of traditional memory technologies are pushing research in the direction of hybrid memory systems that, besides DRAM, include one or more modules based on some of the higher-density non-volatile memory technologies, where one of them will provide the required bandwidth, while the other will provide the required capacity for the application. This creates many challenges with data placement and migration policies between the modules of such hybrid memory system. In this paper, we propose an architecture with a hybrid memory design that places two technologically different memory modules in a flat address space. On such system, we evaluate several HPC workloads against different data placement and migration policies, compare their performance by means of execution time and the number of non-volatile memory writes, and consider how it can be applied to the future HPC architectures. Our results show that the hybrid memory system with dynamic page migration and limited DRAM capacity, can achieve performance that is comparable to a hypothetical, hard to implement, DRAM-only system.

Simulation is a key tool for computer architecture research. In particular, cycle-accurate simulators are extremely important for microarchitecture exploration and detailed design decisions, but they are slow and, so, not suitable for simulating large-scale architectures, nor are they meant for this. Moreover, microarchitecture design decisions are irrelevant, or even misleading, for early processor design stages and high-level explorations. This allows one to raise the abstraction level of the simulated architecture, and also the application abstraction level, as it does not necessarily have to be represented as an instruction stream. In this paper we introduce a definition of different application abstraction levels, and how these are employed in TaskSim, a multi-core architecture simulator, to provide several architecture modeling abstractions, and simulate large-scale architectures with hundreds of cores. We compare the simulation speed of these abstraction levels to the ones in existing simulation tools, and also evaluate their utility and accuracy. Our simulations show that a very high-level abstraction, which may be even faster than native execution, is useful for scalability studies on parallel applications; and that just simulating explicit memory transfers, we achieve accurate simulations for architectures using non-coherent scratchpad memories, with just a 25x slowdown compared to native execution. Furthermore, we revisit trace memory simulation techniques, that are more abstract than instruction-by-instruction simulations and provide an 18x simulation speedup.