Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matt MacMahon
dblp:10/2345
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 57% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33% Language models and text generation · 10% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Local Metrical and Global Topological Maps in the Hybrid Spatial Semantic Hierarchy · ICRA 2004 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › robot mapping
topological mapping |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Local Metrical and Global Topological Maps in the Hybrid Spatial Semantic Hierarchy · ICRA 2004 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › robot mapping
metric mapping |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Local Metrical and Global Topological Maps in the Hybrid Spatial Semantic Hierarchy · ICRA 2004 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Walk the Talk: Connecting Language, Knowledge, and Action in Route Instructions
Matt MacMahon, Brian Stankiewicz, Benjamin Kuipers |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2004 | Local Metrical and Global Topological Maps in the Hybrid Spatial Semantic HierarchyabstractTopological and metrical methods for representing spatial knowledge have complementary strengths. We present a hybrid extension to the spatial semantic hierarchy that combines their strengths and avoids their weaknesses. Metrical SLAM methods are used to build local maps of small-scale space within the sensory horizon of the agent, while topological methods are used to represent the structure of large-scale space. We describe how a local perceptual map is analyzed to identify a local topology description and is abstracted to a topological place. The map building method creates a set of topological map hypotheses that are consistent with travel experience. The set of maps is guaranteed under reasonable assumptions to include the correct map. We demonstrate the method on a real environment with multiple nested large-scale loops. Benjamin Kuipers, Joseph Modayil, Patrick Beeson, Matt MacMahon, Francesco Savelli |
ICRA | 4 |