Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William Dabney

dblp:10/242 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Reinforcement learning · 73% Optimization for machine learning · 19% Learning theory · 8%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning
0.322014
Natural Temporal Difference Learning · AAAI 2014
Adaptive Step-Size for Online Temporal Difference Learning · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning
0.212015
RLPy: a value-function-based reinforcement learning framework for education and research · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization › gradient descent
natural gradient descent
0.212014
Natural Temporal Difference Learning · AAAI 2014
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
actor-critic methods
0.212013
Projected Natural Actor-Critic · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
constrained policy optimization
0.212013
Projected Natural Actor-Critic · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › actor-critic methods
natural actor-critic
0.212013
Projected Natural Actor-Critic · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning
0.212013
Projected Natural Actor-Critic · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adaptive learning rate
0.112012
Adaptive Step-Size for Online Temporal Difference Learning · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.112012
Adaptive Step-Size for Online Temporal Difference Learning · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
relational reinforcement learning
0.112007
Utile Distinctions for Relational Reinforcement Learning · IJCAI 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

natural gradient descent · 0.4value function approximation · 0.2bellman error minimization · 0.2mirror descent · 0.2linear function approximation · 0.1gradient descent · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 RLPy: a value-function-based reinforcement learning framework for education and research
Alborz Geramifard, Christoph Dann, Robert H. Klein, William Dabney, Jonathan P. How
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2014 Natural Temporal Difference Learning
abstract
In this paper we investigate the application of natural gradient descent to Bellman error based reinforcement learning algorithms. This combination is interesting because natural gradient descent is invariant to the parameterization of the value function. This invariance property means that natural gradient descent adapts its update directions to correct for poorly conditioned representations. We present and analyze quadratic and linear time natural temporal difference learning algorithms, and prove that they are covariant. We conclude with experiments which suggest that the natural algorithms can match or outperform their non-natural counterparts using linear function approximation, and drastically improve upon their non-natural counterparts when using non-linear function approximation.
William Dabney, Philip S. Thomas
AAAI1
2013 Projected Natural Actor-Critic
abstract
Natural actor-critics are a popular class of policy search algorithms for finding locally optimal policies for Markov decision processes. In this paper we address a drawback of natural actor-critics that limits their real-world applicability - their lack of safety guarantees. We present a principled algorithm for performing natural gradient descent over a constrained domain. In the context of reinforcement learning, this allows for natural actor-critic algorithms that are guaranteed to remain within a known safe region of policy space. While deriving our class of constrained natural actor-critic algorithms, which we call Projected Natural Actor-Critics (PNACs), we also elucidate the relationship between natural gradient descent and mirror descent.
Philip S. Thomas, William Dabney, Stephen Giguere 0001, Sridhar Mahadevan
NIPS2
2012 Adaptive Step-Size for Online Temporal Difference Learning
abstract
The step-size, often denoted as α, is a key parameter for most incremental learning algorithms. Its importance is especially pronounced when performing online temporal difference (TD) learning with function approximation. Several methods have been developed to adapt the step-size online. These range from straightforward back-off strategies to adaptive algorithms based on gradient descent. We derive an adaptive upper bound on the step-size parameter to guarantee that online TD learning with linear function approximation will not diverge. We then empirically evaluate algorithms using this upper bound as a heuristic for adapting the step-size parameter online. We compare performance with related work including HL(λ) and Autostep. Our results show that this adaptive upper bound heuristic out-performs all existing methods without requiring any meta-parameters. This effectively eliminates the need to tune the learning rate of temporal difference learning with linear function approximation.
William Dabney, Andrew G. Barto
AAAI1
2012 A framework for manipulating and searching multiple retrieval types
abstract
Conventional retrieval systems view documents as a unit and look at different retrieval types within a document. We introduce Proteus, a frame-work for seamlessly navigating books as dynamic collections which are defined on the fly. Proteus allows us to search various retrieval types. Navigable types include pages, books, named persons, locations, and pictures in a collection of books taken from the Internet Archive. The demonstration shows the value of multi-type browsing in dynamic collections to peruse new data.
Marc-Allen Cartright, Ethem F. Can, William Dabney, Jeff Dalton 0001, Logan Giorda, Kriste Krstovski, Xiaoye Wu, Ismet Zeki Yalniz, James Allan 0001, R. Manmatha, David A. Smith
SIGIR3
2007 Utile Distinctions for Relational Reinforcement Learning
William Dabney, Amy McGovern
IJCAI1