Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James S. K. Tee

dblp:10/2747 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 6 · 6 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Coding theory · 89% Mathematical optimization · 11%
Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory
channel coding
0.122003
Multiple serial and parallel concatenated single parity-check codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2003
Suboptimal SISO decoding of systematic binary algebraic block codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2003
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
iterative decoding
0.122003
Multiple serial and parallel concatenated single parity-check codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2003
Suboptimal SISO decoding of systematic binary algebraic block codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2003
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › algebraic coding theory
algebraic block codes
0.012003
Suboptimal SISO decoding of systematic binary algebraic block codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2003
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
block codes
0.012003
Suboptimal SISO decoding of systematic binary algebraic block codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2003
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
concatenated codes
0.012003
Multiple serial and parallel concatenated single parity-check codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2003
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis
0.012003
Multiple serial and parallel concatenated single parity-check codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2003
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › decoding algorithms › optimal decoding
MAP decoding
0.012003
Suboptimal SISO decoding of systematic binary algebraic block codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2003
Physical-layer communications › modulation › coded modulation
bit-interleaved coded modulation
0.012003
Multiple serial and parallel concatenated single parity-check codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2003
Physical-layer communications
modulation
0.012003
Multiple serial and parallel concatenated single parity-check codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2003
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes › linear code › parity-check codes
single parity check codes
0.012003
Suboptimal SISO decoding of systematic binary algebraic block codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.1analytical bounds · 0.1soft-decision decoding · 0.0algebraic decoding · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Suboptimal SISO decoding of systematic binary algebraic block codes
abstract
Previous work on concatenated single parity-check codes has yielded exceptionally good performance despite, or perhaps because of, their weak algebraic structure. In this article, maximum a posteriori single parity-check decoders are applied to the decoding of systematic binary algebraic block codes. Results for a range of Hamming codes show good performance compared to soft-decision brute force (maximum-likelihood) and algebraic decoding. The decoding complexity of the proposed technique grows only linearly with increasing block length.
James S. K. Tee, Desmond P. Taylor
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
2003 Multiple serial and parallel concatenated single parity-check codes
abstract
Single parity-check (SPC) codes are applied in both parallel and serial concatenated structures to produce high-performance coding schemes. The number of concatenations or stages, M, is increased to improve system performance at moderate-to-low bit-error rates without changing the overall code parameters (namely, code rate and code block length). Analytical bounds are presented to estimate the performance at high signal-to-noise ratios. The SPC concatenated codes are considered with binary phase-shift keying and with 16-quadrature amplitude modulation bit-interleaved coded modulation on the additive white Gaussian noise channel and the independent Rayleigh fading channel. Simulations show that the four-stage serial or parallel concatenated SPC codes can, respectively, outperform or perform as well as 16-state turbo codes. Furthermore, decoding complexity is approximately 9-10 times less complex than that of 16-state turbo codes. The convergence behavior of both serial and parallel concatenated SPC codes is also discussed.
James S. K. Tee, Desmond P. Taylor, Philippa A. Martin
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
2002 A generalised performance bounding technique for bit interleaved coded modulation systems in the Rayleigh fading channel
abstract
A generalised performance bounding technique for BICM systems is presented. We show that, in the Rayleigh fading channel, it is possible to estimate accurately the error performance of coded BICM systems employing large signal constellations, by using only the error performance of a BPSK system employing the same code in the same channel. Our method generalizes the work of G. Caire et al. (see IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, vol.44, no.3, p.927-46, 1998) to all SNR values and is independent of the channel coding scheme and the code rate. The work here implies that, in the Rayleigh fading channel, analytical bounds for any coding scheme derived for the BPSK system can be easily applied to BICM systems with larger signal constellations. Simulation results are presented for the Rayleigh fading channel to verify the analysis.
James S. K. Tee, Desmond P. Taylor
ICC1
2001 Multiple parallel concatenated single parity check codes
abstract
In this paper, single parity check (SPC) codes are applied in a parallel concatenated structure to produce a high performance coding scheme with very low complexity. We show a simple yet elegant way of improving system performance at medium-low bit error rates (BER), without changing the overall code parameters (code rate, code block length). We compare its BER performance with other coding schemes. Multiple parallel concatenated SPC (M-PC-SPC) codes are capable of outperforming not only the best 64-state convolutional coding schemes, but also the 16-state turbo codes. For bit interleaved coded modulation (BICM) schemes, the 4 parallel concatenated SPC code is about 10 times less complex than the 16-state turbo codes, and yet with only 5 iterations, it still performs better than the turbo code iterated 6 times in the fading and AWGN channel. Combined with multilevel modulation schemes, this high performance scheme is very suitable for practical systems due to its flexible code parameters, and low complexity.
James S. K. Tee, Desmond P. Taylor
ICC1
2000 Iterative decoding of systematic binary algebraic block codes
abstract
In this paper, MAP decoders for single parity check (SPC) codes are applied to the decoding of systematic binary algebraic block codes. We compare the performance of this decoding technique to hard decision syndrome decoding and soft decision brute force decoding. Simulation results are presented for the (7,4,3) and (15,11,3) Hamming codes in the AWGN and Rayleigh fading channels. Using a product (7,4,3) Hamming code, the proposed scheme is also compared to the dual code technique as described Berrou and Glavieux (see IEEE Trans. Communications, vol.44, no.10, p.1261-71, 1996). Although the BER performance is slightly inferior, the proposed scheme is much less complex to implement.
James S. K. Tee, Desmond P. Taylor
GLOBECOM1
2000 Multiple Serially Concatenated Single Parity Check Codes
abstract
Single parity check (SPC) codes are applied in a serial concatenation structure to produce a high performance coding scheme with very low complexity. We show a simple yet elegant way of improving the system performance at low bit error rates (BER), without changing the overall code parameters (code rate, code block length). We compare its BER performance to the best 64-state convolutional codes, and the 16-state turbo codes. Comparisons show that its performance is only slightly poorer. Despite this inferior performance, the scheme is very suitable for practical implementation due to its flexible code parameters. We conclude by showing that its decoding complexity is more than 1 order of magnitude less than that of a 16-state turbo code.
James S. K. Tee, Desmond P. Taylor
ICC (2)1