Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hongkai Ji
dblp:10/3113
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-6480-0141ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 12 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
7 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
cell clustering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | EDClust: an EM-MM hybrid method for cell clustering in multiple-subject single-cell RNA sequencing · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell transcriptomics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | EDClust: an EM-MM hybrid method for cell clustering in multiple-subject single-cell RNA sequencing · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
ChIP-seq analysis |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | ChIP-PED enhances the analysis of ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip data · Bioinform. 2013 hmChIP: a database and web server for exploring publicly available human and mouse ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip data · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
epigenomics |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | hmChIP: a database and web server for exploring publicly available human and mouse ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip data · Bioinform. 2011 JAMIE: joint analysis of multiple ChIP-chip experiments · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › ChIP-seq analysis
ChIP-seq data integration |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | ChIP-PED enhances the analysis of ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip data · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | ChIP-PED enhances the analysis of ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip data · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding site prediction |
0.1 | 2 | 2010 | JAMIE: joint analysis of multiple ChIP-chip experiments · Bioinform. 2010 TileMap: create chromosomal map of tiling array hybridizations · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
ChIP-chip analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | JAMIE: joint analysis of multiple ChIP-chip experiments · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | TileProbe: modeling tiling array probe effects using publicly available data · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell epigenomics
single-cell ATAC-seq analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Single-cell regulome data analysis by SCRAT · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data analysis
tiling array analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | TileMap: create chromosomal map of tiling array hybridizations · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein bioinformatics
protein-DNA interaction |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | hmChIP: a database and web server for exploring publicly available human and mouse ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip data · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene regulation |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | JAMIE: joint analysis of multiple ChIP-chip experiments · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | JAMIE: joint analysis of multiple ChIP-chip experiments · Bioinform. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dirichlet-multinomial mixture · 0.6EM-MM hybrid algorithm · 0.6clustering · 0.4feature summarization · 0.3permutation testing · 0.2kernel smoothing · 0.2hierarchical mixture model · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1statistical modeling · 0.1hidden markov model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | EDClust: an EM-MM hybrid method for cell clustering in multiple-subject single-cell RNA sequencingabstractMOTIVATION: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revolutionized biological research by enabling the measurement of transcriptomic profiles at the single-cell level. With the increasing application of scRNA-seq in larger-scale studies, the problem of appropriately clustering cells emerges when the scRNA-seq data are from multiple subjects. One challenge is the subject-specific variation; systematic heterogeneity from multiple subjects may have a significant impact on clustering accuracy. Existing methods seeking to address such effects suffer from several limitations. RESULTS: We develop a novel statistical method, EDClust, for multi-subject scRNA-seq cell clustering. EDClust models the sequence read counts by a mixture of Dirichlet-multinomial distributions and explicitly accounts for cell-type heterogeneity, subject heterogeneity and clustering uncertainty. An EM-MM hybrid algorithm is derived for maximizing the data likelihood and clustering the cells. We perform a series of simulation studies to evaluate the proposed method and demonstrate the outstanding performance of EDClust. Comprehensive benchmarking on four real scRNA-seq datasets with various tissue types and species demonstrates the substantial accuracy improvement of EDClust compared to existing methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package is freely available at https://github.com/weix21/EDClust. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Ziyi Li 0001, Hongkai Ji, Hao Wu 0003 |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2017 | Single-cell regulome data analysis by SCRATabstractSUMMARY: Emerging single-cell technologies (e.g. single-cell ATAC-seq, DNase-seq or ChIP-seq) have made it possible to assay regulome of individual cells. Single-cell regulome data are highly sparse and discrete. Analyzing such data is challenging. User-friendly software tools are still lacking. We present SCRAT, a Single-Cell Regulome Analysis Toolbox with a graphical user interface, for studying cell heterogeneity using single-cell regulome data. SCRAT can be used to conveniently summarize regulatory activities according to different features (e.g. gene sets, transcription factor binding motif sites, etc.). Using these features, users can identify cell subpopulations in a heterogeneous biological sample, infer cell identities of each subpopulation, and discover distinguishing features such as gene sets and transcription factors that show different activities among subpopulations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SCRAT is freely available at https://zhiji.shinyapps.io/scrat as an online web service and at https://github.com/zji90/SCRAT as an R package. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Weiqiang Zhou, Hongkai Ji |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2016 | Single-Cell Co-expression Analysis Reveals Distinct Functional Modules, Co-regulation Mechanisms and Clinical OutcomesabstractCo-expression analysis has been employed to predict gene function, identify functional modules, and determine tumor subtypes. Previous co-expression analysis was mainly conducted at bulk tissue level. It is unclear whether co-expression analysis at the single-cell level will provide novel insights into transcriptional regulation. Here we developed a computational approach to compare glioblastoma expression profiles at the single-cell level with those obtained from bulk tumors. We found that the co-expressed genes observed in single cells and bulk tumors have little overlap and show distinct characteristics. The co-expressed genes identified in bulk tumors tend to have similar biological functions, and are enriched for intrachromosomal interactions with synchronized promoter activity. In contrast, single-cell co-expressed genes are enriched for known protein-protein interactions, and are regulated through interchromosomal interactions. Moreover, gene members of some protein complexes are co-expressed only at the bulk level, while those of other complexes are co-expressed at both single-cell and bulk levels. Finally, we identified a set of co-expressed genes that can predict the survival of glioblastoma patients. Our study highlights that comparative analyses of single-cell and bulk gene expression profiles enable us to identify functional modules that are regulated at different levels and hold great translational potential. Jie Wang 0066, Shuli Xia, Brian Arand, Raghu Machiraju, Kun Huang 0001, Hongkai Ji |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 7 |
| 2013 | ChIP-PED enhances the analysis of ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip dataabstractMOTIVATION: Although chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) or tiling array hybridization (ChIP-chip) is increasingly used to map genome-wide-binding sites of transcription factors (TFs), it still remains difficult to generate a quality ChIPx (i.e. ChIP-seq or ChIP-chip) dataset because of the tremendous amount of effort required to develop effective antibodies and efficient protocols. Moreover, most laboratories are unable to easily obtain ChIPx data for one or more TF(s) in more than a handful of biological contexts. Thus, standard ChIPx analyses primarily focus on analyzing data from one experiment, and the discoveries are restricted to a specific biological context. RESULTS: We propose to enrich this existing data analysis paradigm by developing a novel approach, ChIP-PED, which superimposes ChIPx data on large amounts of publicly available human and mouse gene expression data containing a diverse collection of cell types, tissues and disease conditions to discover new biological contexts with potential TF regulatory activities. We demonstrate ChIP-PED using a number of examples, including a novel discovery that MYC, a human TF, plays an important functional role in pediatric Ewing sarcoma cell lines. These examples show that ChIP-PED increases the value of ChIPx data by allowing one to expand the scope of possible discoveries made from a ChIPx experiment. AVAILABILITY: http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~gewu/ChIPPED/ George Wu, Jason T. Yustein, Matthew N. McCall, Michael J. Zilliox, Rafael A. Irizarry, Karen Zeller, Chi V. Dang, Hongkai Ji |
Bioinform. | 8 |
| 2013 | Gene set bagging for estimating the probability a statistically significant result will replicateabstractBACKGROUND: Significance analysis plays a major role in identifying and ranking genes, transcription factor binding sites, DNA methylation regions, and other high-throughput features associated with illness. We propose a new approach, called gene set bagging, for measuring the probability that a gene set replicates in future studies. Gene set bagging involves resampling the original high-throughput data, performing gene-set analysis on the resampled data, and confirming that biological categories replicate in the bagged samples. RESULTS: Using both simulated and publicly-available genomics data, we demonstrate that significant categories in a gene set enrichment analysis may be unstable when subjected to resampling. We show our method estimates the replication probability (R), the probability that a gene set will replicate as a significant result in future studies, and show in simulations that this method reflects replication better than each set's p-value. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that gene lists based on p-values are not necessarily stable, and therefore additional steps like gene set bagging may improve biological inference on gene sets. Andrew E. Jaffe, John D. Storey, Hongkai Ji, Jeffrey T. Leek |
BMC Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2013 | ChIPXpress: using publicly available gene expression data to improve ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip target gene rankingabstractBACKGROUND: ChIPx (i.e., ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip) is increasingly used to map genome-wide transcription factor (TF) binding sites. A single ChIPx experiment can identify thousands of TF bound genes, but typically only a fraction of these genes are functional targets that respond transcriptionally to perturbations of TF expression. To identify promising functional target genes for follow-up studies, researchers usually collect gene expression data from TF perturbation experiments to determine which of the TF targets respond transcriptionally to binding. Unfortunately, approximately 40% of ChIPx studies do not have accompanying gene expression data from TF perturbation experiments. For these studies, genes are often prioritized solely based on the binding strengths of ChIPx signals in order to choose follow-up candidates. ChIPXpress is a novel method that improves upon this ChIPx-only ranking approach by integrating ChIPx data with large amounts of Publicly available gene Expression Data (PED). RESULTS: We demonstrate that PED does contain useful information to identify functional TF target genes despite its inherent heterogeneity. A truncated absolute correlation measure is developed to better capture the regulatory relationships between TFs and their target genes in PED. By integrating the information from ChIPx and PED, ChIPXpress can significantly increase the chance of finding functional target genes responsive to TF perturbation among the top ranked genes. ChIPXpress is implemented as an easy-to-use R/Bioconductor package. We evaluate ChIPXpress using 10 different ChIPx datasets in mouse and human and find that ChIPXpress rankings are more accurate than rankings based solely on ChIPx data and may result in substantial improvement in prediction accuracy, irrespective of which peak calling algorithm is used to analyze the ChIPx data. CONCLUSIONS: ChIPXpress provides a new tool to better prioritize TF bound genes from ChIPx experiments for follow-up studies when investigators do not have their own gene expression data. It demonstrates that the regulatory information from PED can be used to boost ChIPx data analyses. It also represents an important step towards more fully utilizing the valuable, but highly heterogeneous data contained in public gene expression databases. George Wu, Hongkai Ji |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2012 | iASeq: integrating multiple chip-seq datasets for detecting allele-specific bindingabstractChIP-seq provides new opportunities to study allele-specific protein-DNA binding (ASB). Detecting ASB from ChIP-seq often suffers from low statistical power since only sequence reads mapped to heterozygote SNPs are informative for allelic inference. Moreover, little is known about the correlation patterns of ASB among different transcription factors and histone modifications. We address both issues by developing iASeq to jointly analyze multiple ChIP-seq datasets. iASeq uses a Bayesian hierarchical model to automatically discover correlation patterns of ASB among multiple proteins. It then uses this correlation to borrow information across datasets to improve ASB detection. Application of iASeq to 57 ENCODE datasets consisting of 117 ChIP-seq samples from GM12878 cells discovers synergistic allele-specificity patterns across different proteins. The analysis also shows the ability of iASeq to increase the power of ASB detection compared with the traditional approach which analyzes each individual dataset separately. According to two gold standards, iASeq's increased the accuracy of identifying ASB substantially. iASeq demonstrates the value of integrating multiple datasets in the analysis of ASB, and it offers a new tool to better characterize allele-specificity. A user friendly R package is made available for iASeq. In principle, the same model can be applied to call allele-specific expression and allele-specific methylation by integrating multiple RNA-seq and MeDIP-seq studies. Qianfei Wang, Hongkai Ji |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2011 | hmChIP: a database and web server for exploring publicly available human and mouse ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip dataabstractUNLABELLED: hmChIP is a database of genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) data in human and mouse. Currently, the database contains 2016 samples from 492 ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip experiments, representing a total of 170 proteins and 11 069 914 protein-DNA interactions. A web server provides interface for database query. Protein-DNA binding intensities can be retrieved from individual samples for user-provided genomic regions. The retrieved intensities can be used to cluster samples and genomic regions to facilitate exploration of combinatorial patterns, cell-type dependencies, and cross-sample variability of protein-DNA interactions. AVAILABILITY: http://jilab.biostat.jhsph.edu/database/cgi-bin/hmChIP.pl. Li Chen 0029, George Wu, Hongkai Ji |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2010 | JAMIE: joint analysis of multiple ChIP-chip experimentsabstractMOTIVATION: Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by genome tiling array hybridization (ChIP-chip) is a powerful approach to identify transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) in target genomes. When multiple related ChIP-chip datasets are available, analyzing them jointly allows one to borrow information across datasets to improve peak detection. This is particularly useful for analyzing noisy datasets. RESULTS: We propose a hierarchical mixture model and develop an R package JAMIE to perform the joint analysis. The genome is assumed to consist of background and potential binding regions (PBRs). PBRs have context-dependent probabilities to become bona fide binding sites in individual datasets. This model captures the correlation among datasets, which provides basis for sharing information across experiments. Real data tests illustrate the advantage of JAMIE over a strategy that analyzes individual datasets separately. AVAILABILITY: JAMIE is freely available from http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~hji/jamie Hao Wu 0003, Hongkai Ji |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2009 | TileProbe: modeling tiling array probe effects using publicly available dataabstractMOTIVATION: Individual probes on an Affymetrix tiling array usually behave differently. Modeling and removing these probe effects are critical for detecting signals from the array data. Current data processing techniques either require control samples or use probe sequences to model probe-specific variability, such as with MAT. Although the MAT approach can be applied without control samples, residual probe effects continue to distort the true biological signals. RESULTS: We propose TileProbe, a new technique that builds upon the MAT algorithm by incorporating publicly available data sets to remove tiling array probe effects. By using a large number of these readily available arrays, TileProbe robustly models the residual probe effects that MAT model cannot explain. When applied to analyzing ChIP-chip data, TileProbe performs consistently better than MAT across a variety of analytical conditions. This shows that TileProbe resolves the issue of probe-specific effects more completely. AVAILABILITY: http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/ approximately hji/cisgenome/index_files/tileprobe.htm. Jennifer Toolan Judy, Hongkai Ji |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2006 | An improved distance measure between the expression profiles linking co-expression and co-regulation in mouseabstractBACKGROUND: Many statistical algorithms combine microarray expression data and genome sequence data to identify transcription factor binding motifs in the low eukaryotic genomes. Finding cis-regulatory elements in higher eukaryote genomes, however, remains a challenge, as searching in the promoter regions of genes with similar expression patterns often fails. The difficulty is partially attributable to the poor performance of the similarity measures for comparing expression profiles. The widely accepted measures are inadequate for distinguishing genes transcribed from distinct regulatory mechanisms in the complicated genomes of higher eukaryotes. RESULTS: By defining the regulatory similarity between a gene pair as the number of common known transcription factor binding motifs in the promoter regions, we compared the performance of several expression distance measures on seven mouse expression data sets. We propose a new distance measure that accounts for both the linear trends and fold-changes of expression across the samples. CONCLUSION: The study reveals that the proposed distance measure for comparing expression profiles enables us to identify genes with large number of common regulatory elements because it reflects the inherent regulatory information better than widely accepted distance measures such as the Pearson's correlation or cosine correlation with or without log transformation. Ryung S. Kim, Hongkai Ji, Wing Hung Wong |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2005 | TileMap: create chromosomal map of tiling array hybridizationsabstractMOTIVATION: Tiling array is a new type of microarray that can be used to survey genomic transcriptional activities and transcription factor binding sites at high resolution. The goal of this paper is to develop effective statistical tools to identify genomic loci that show transcriptional or protein binding patterns of interest. RESULTS: A two-step approach is proposed and is implemented in TileMap. In the first step, a test-statistic is computed for each probe based on a hierarchical empirical Bayes model. In the second step, the test-statistics of probes within a genomic region are used to infer whether the region is of interest or not. Hierarchical empirical Bayes model shrinks variance estimates and increases sensitivity of the analysis. It allows complex multiple sample comparisons that are essential for the study of temporal and spatial patterns of hybridization across different experimental conditions. Neighboring probes are combined through a moving average method (MA) or a hidden Markov model (HMM). Unbalanced mixture subtraction is proposed to provide approximate estimates of false discovery rate for MA and model parameters for HMM. AVAILABILITY: TileMap is freely available at http://biogibbs.stanford.edu/~jihk/TileMap/index.htm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://biogibbs.stanford.edu/~jihk/TileMap/index.htm (includes coloured versions of all figures). Hongkai Ji, Wing Hung Wong |
Bioinform. | 1 |