Tables serve as a core format for representing structured data on the web, as their two-dimensional layouts effectively encode complex inter-entity relationships. However, real-world web tables often feature heterogeneous structures and rich semantics. Accurately interpreting such tables requires not only spatial layout perception but also multi-step reasoning across rows and columns, posing substantial challenges to web intelligence systems. Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show promise in table question answering (TableQA) by leveraging visual layouts. However, their performance on complex web tables remains uneven, as existing benchmarks often blur the impact of individual difficulty factors, hindering precise capability analysis. To advance TableQA beyond superficial task difficulty and toward interpretable capability modeling, we introduce MMTableBench, a multi-level benchmark that systematically evaluates MLLMs along two fine-grained dimensions: layout complexity and reasoning complexity. By organizing table-question pairs along these axes, MMTableBench facilitates a detailed evaluation of model performance under varying structural and reasoning challenges, while revealing the respective strengths and limitations of multimodal inputs. Our comprehensive analysis shows that state-of-the-art MLLMs continue to exhibit notable limitations when confronted with complex layouts and deep reasoning tasks, underscoring persistent gaps despite the structural advantages offered by visual inputs. MMTableBench thus provides not only a rigorous evaluation framework but also a diagnostic tool for analyzing and interpreting model behaviors, enabling more transparent and explainable progress in multimodal TableQA development.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides in Natural Language Processing and coding, yet they struggle with robustness and accuracy in complex function calls. To tackle these challenges, this paper introduces ADC, an innovative approach that enhances LLMs’ ability to follow function formats and match complex parameters. ADC utilizes a high-quality code fine-tuning dataset with line-level execution feedback, providing granular process supervision that fosters strong logical reasoning and adherence to function formats. It also employs an adversarial dataset generation process to improve parameter matching. The staged training methodology capitalizes on both enriched code datasets and refined adversarial datasets, leading to marked improvements in function calling capabilities on the Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) Benchmark. The innovation of ADC lies in its strategic combination of process supervision, adversarial refinement, and incremental learning, setting a new standard for LLM proficiency in complex function calling.

The increasing application of multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) across various sectors have spotlighted the essence of their output reliability and accuracy, particularly their ability to produce content grounded in factual information (e.g. common and domain-specific knowledge). In this work, we introduce SimpleVQA, the first comprehensive multi-modal benchmark to evaluate the factuality ability of MLLMs to answer natural language short questions. SimpleVQA is characterized by six key features: it covers multiple tasks and multiple scenarios, ensures high quality and challenging queries, maintains static and timeless reference answers, and is straightforward to evaluate. Our approach involves categorizing visual question-answering items into 9 different tasks around objective events or common knowledge and situating these within 9 topics. Rigorous quality control processes are implemented to guarantee high-quality, concise, and clear answers, facilitating evaluation with minimal variance via an LLM-as-a-judge scoring system. Using SimpleVQA, we perform a comprehensive assessment of leading 18 MLLMs and 8 text-only LLMs, delving into their image comprehension and text generation abilities by identifying and analyzing error cases.