Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tryggve Fossum

dblp:10/4722 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Memory systems · 87% Parallel and multicore computing · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems
cache coherence
0.212013
Using in-flight chains to build a scalable cache coherence protocol · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2013
Memory systems › cache coherence
directory-based coherence
0.212013
Using in-flight chains to build a scalable cache coherence protocol · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2013
Parallel and multicore computing › multiprocessor system
scalable multiprocessor
0.012013
Using in-flight chains to build a scalable cache coherence protocol · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

in-flight chains · 0.2hierarchical tag directory · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Using in-flight chains to build a scalable cache coherence protocol
abstract
As microprocessor designs integrate more cores, scalability of cache coherence protocols becomes a challenging problem. Most directory-based protocols avoid races by using blocking tag directories that can impact the performance of parallel applications. In this article, we first quantitatively demonstrate that state-of-the-art blocking protocols significantly constrain throughput at large core counts for several parallel applications. Nonblocking protocols address this throughput concern at the expense of scalability in the interconnection network or in the required resource overheads. To address this concern, we enhance nonblocking directory protocols by migrating the point of service of responses. Our approach uses in-flight chains of cores making parallel memory requests to incorporate scalability while maintaining high-throughput. The proposed cache coherence protocol called chained cache coherence , can outperform blocking protocols by up to 20% on scientific and 12% on commercial applications. It also has low resource overheads and simple address ordering requirements making it both a high-performance and scalable protocol. Furthermore, in-flight chains provide a scalable solution to building hierarchical and nonblocking tag directories as well as optimize communication latencies.
Samantika Sury, Simon C. Steely Jr., William Hasenplaugh, Aamer Jaleel, Carl J. Beckmann, Tryggve Fossum, Joel S. Emer
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim.6
2004 Cache Scrubbing in Microprocessors: Myth or Necessity?
abstract
Transient faults from neutron and alpha particle strikes in large SRAM caches have become a major problem for microprocessor designers. To protect these caches, designers often use error correcting codes (ECC), which typically provide single-bit error correction and double-bit error detection (SECDED). Unfortunately, two separate strikes could still flip two different bits in the same ECC-protected word. This we call a temporal double-bit error. SECDED ECC can only detect, not correct such errors. We show how to compute the mean time to failure for temporal double-bit errors. Additionally, we show how fixed-interval scrubbing - in which error checkers periodically access cache blocks and remove single-bit errors - can mitigate such errors in processor caches. Our analysis using current soft error rates shows that only very large caches (e.g., hundreds of megabytes to gigabytes) need scrubbing to reduce the temporal double-bit error rate to a tolerable range.
Shubhendu S. Mukherjee, Joel S. Emer, Tryggve Fossum, Steven K. Reinhardt
PRDC3