Periocular biometrics is the recognition of individuals based on the appearance of the region around the eye. Periocular recognition may be useful in applications where it is difficult to obtain a clear picture of an iris for iris biometrics, or a complete picture of a face for face biometrics. Previous periocular research has used either visible-light (VL) or near-infrared (NIR) light images, but no prior research has directly compared the two illuminations using images with similar resolution. We conducted an experiment in which volunteers were asked to compare pairs of periocular images. Some pairs showed images taken in VL, and some showed images taken in NIR light. Participants labeled each pair as belonging to the same person or to different people. Untrained participants with limited viewing times correctly classified VL image pairs with 88% accuracy, and NIR image pairs with 79% accuracy. For comparison, we presented pairs of iris images from the same subjects. In addition, we investigated differences between performance on light and dark eyes and relative helpfulness of various features in the periocular region under different illuminations. We calculated performance of three computer algorithms on the periocular images. Performance for humans and computers was similar.

The most common iris biometric algorithm represents the texture of an iris using a binary iris code. Not all bits in an iris code are equally consistent. A bit is deemed fragile if its value changes across iris codes created from different images of the same iris. Previous research has shown that iris recognition performance can be improved by masking these fragile bits. Rather than ignoring fragile bits completely, we consider what beneficial information can be obtained from the fragile bits. We find that the locations of fragile bits tend to be consistent across different iris codes of the same eye. We present a metric, called the fragile bit distance, which quantitatively measures the coincidence of the fragile bit patterns in two iris codes. We find that score fusion of fragile bit distance and Hamming distance works better for recognition than Hamming distance alone. To our knowledge, this is the first and only work to use the coincidence of fragile bit locations to improve the accuracy of matches.

Today, campus grids provide users with easy access to thousands of CPUs. However, it is not always easy for nonexpert users to harness these systems effectively. A large workload composed in what seems to be the obvious way by a naive user may accidentally abuse shared resources and achieve very poor performance. To address this problem, we argue that campus grids should provide end users with high-level abstractions that allow for the easy expression and efficient execution of data-intensive workloads. We present one example of an abstraction—All-Pairs—that fits the needs of several applications in biometrics, bioinformatics, and data mining. We demonstrate that an optimized All-Pairs abstraction is both easier to use than the underlying system, achieve performance orders of magnitude better than the obvious but naive approach, and is both faster and more efficient than a tuned conventional approach. This abstraction has been in production use for one year on a 500 CPU campus grid at the University of Notre Dame and has been used to carry out a groundbreaking analysis of biometric data.

We take advantage of the temporal continuity in an iris video to improve matching performance using signal-level fusion. From multiple frames of a frontal iris video, we create a single average image. For comparison, we reimplement three score-level fusion methods (Ma, Krichen, and Schmid). We find that our signal-level fusion ofNimages performs better than Ma's or Krichen's score-level fusion methods ofNHamming distance scores. Our signal-level fusion performs comparably to Schmid's log-likelihood method of score-level fusion, and our method achieves this performance using less computation time. We compare our signal fusion method with another new method: a multigallery, multiprobe method involving score-level fusion ofN2Hamming distances. The multigallery, multiprobe score fusion has slightly better recognition performance, while the signal fusion has significant advantages in memory and computation requirements. No published prior work has shown any advantage of the use of video over still images in iris biometrics.