EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ganesh Sittampalam
dblp:10/5699
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0002-1150-4867ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 7 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
4 papers |
Programming languages and type systems · 62% Program analysis · 34% Compilers and program optimization · 4% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems
aspect-oriented programming |
0.2 | 3 | 2005 | Optimising aspectJ · PLDI 2005 Adding trace matching with free variables to AspectJ · OOPSLA 2005 Measuring the dynamic behaviour of AspectJ programs · OOPSLA 2004 |
Programming languages and type systems
language design |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | Adding trace matching with free variables to AspectJ · OOPSLA 2005 Optimising aspectJ · PLDI 2005 |
Program analysis › static analysis
incremental analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Incremental execution of transformation specifications · POPL 2004 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Measuring the dynamic behaviour of AspectJ programs · OOPSLA 2004 |
Program analysis › dynamic analysis › trace analysis
trace alignment |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Adding trace matching with free variables to AspectJ · OOPSLA 2005 |
Program analysis › dynamic analysis › instrumentation
bytecode instrumentation |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Measuring the dynamic behaviour of AspectJ programs · OOPSLA 2004 |
Compilers and program optimization
program transformation |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Incremental execution of transformation specifications · POPL 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dynamic analysis · 0.1bytecode instrumentation · 0.1regular pattern matching · 0.1free variables · 0.1compiler optimization · 0.1regular patterns · 0.0model checking · 0.0language factors · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Paradise: a two-stage DSL embedded in HaskellabstractWe have implemented a two-stage language, Paradise, for building reusable components which are used to price financial products. Paradise is embedded in Haskell and makes heavy use of type-class based overloading, allowing the second stage to be compiled into a variety of backend platforms. Lennart Augustsson, Howard Mansell, Ganesh Sittampalam |
ICFP | 3 |
| 2006 | Aspects and Data Refinement
Pavel Avgustinov, Eric Bodden, Elnar Hajiyev, Oege de Moor, Neil Ongkingco, Damien Sereni, Ganesh Sittampalam, Julian Tibble |
MPC | 7 |
| 2005 | abc: The AspectBench Compiler for AspectJ
Chris Allan, Pavel Avgustinov, Aske Simon Christensen, Laurie J. Hendren, Sascha Kuzins, Jennifer Lhoták, Ondrej Lhoták, Oege de Moor, Damien Sereni, Ganesh Sittampalam, Julian Tibble |
GPCE | 10 |
| 2005 | Adding trace matching with free variables to AspectJabstractAn aspect observes the execution of a base program; when certain actions occur, the aspect runs some extra code of its own. In the AspectJ language, the observations that an aspect can make are confined to the current action: it is not possible to directly observe the history of a computation.Recently, there have been several interesting proposals for new history-based language features, most notably by Douence et al. and by Walker and Viggers. In this paper, we present a new history-based language feature called tracematches that enables the programmer to trigger the execution of extra code by specifying a regular pattern of events in a computation trace. We have fully designed and implemented tracematches as a seamless extension of AspectJ.A key innovation in our tracematch approach is the introduction of free variables in the matching patterns. This enhancement enables a whole new class of applications in which events can be matched not only by the event kind, but also by the values associated with the free variables. We provide several examples of applications enabled by this feature.After introducing and motivating the idea of tracematches via examples, we present a detailed semantics of our language design, and we derive an implementation from that semantics. The implementation has been realised as an extension of the abc compiler for AspectJ. Chris Allan, Pavel Avgustinov, Aske Simon Christensen, Laurie J. Hendren, Sascha Kuzins, Ondrej Lhoták, Oege de Moor, Damien Sereni, Ganesh Sittampalam, Julian Tibble |
OOPSLA | 9 |
| 2005 | Optimising aspectJ
Pavel Avgustinov, Aske Simon Christensen, Laurie J. Hendren, Sascha Kuzins, Jennifer Lhoták, Ondrej Lhoták, Oege de Moor, Damien Sereni, Ganesh Sittampalam, Julian Tibble |
PLDI | 9 |
| 2004 | Measuring the dynamic behaviour of AspectJ programsabstractThis paper proposes and implements a rigorous method for studying the dynamic behaviour of AspectJ programs. As part of this methodology several new metrics specific to AspectJ programs are proposed and tools for collecting the relevant metrics are presented. The major tools consist of: (1) a modified version of the AspectJ compiler that tags bytecode instructions with an indication of the cause of their generation, such as a particular feature of AspectJ; and (2) a modified version of the *J dynamic metrics collection tool which is composed of a JVMPI-based trace generator and an analyzer which propagates tags and computes the proposed metrics. This dynamic propagation is essential, and thus this paper contributes not only new metrics, but also non-trivial ways of computing them. Bruno Dufour, Christopher Goard, Laurie J. Hendren, Oege de Moor, Ganesh Sittampalam, Clark Verbrugge |
OOPSLA | 5 |
| 2004 | Incremental execution of transformation specificationsabstractWe aim to specify program transformations in a declarative style, and then to generate executable program transformers from such specifications. Many transformations require non-trivial program analysis to check their applicability, and it is prohibitively expensive to re-run such analyses after each transformation. It is desirable, therefore, that the analysis information is incrementally updated.We achieve this by drawing on two pieces of previous work: first, Bernhard Steffen's proposal to use model checking for certain analysis problems, and second, John Conway's theory of language factors. The first allows the neat specification of transformations, while the second opens the way for an incremental implementation. The two ideas are linked by using regular patterns instead of Steffen's modal logic: these patterns can be viewed as queries on the set of program paths. Ganesh Sittampalam, Oege de Moor, Ken Friis Larsen |
POPL | 1 |
| 2002 | Transforming the .NET intermediate language using path logic programmingabstractPath logic programming is a modest extension of Prolog for the specification of program transformations. We give an informal introduction to this extension, and we show how it can be used in coding standard compiler optimisations, and also a number of obfuscating transformations. The object language is the Microsoft .NET intermediate language (IL). Stephen Drape, Oege de Moor, Ganesh Sittampalam |
PPDP | 3 |
| 2001 | Higher-order matching for program transformation
Oege de Moor, Ganesh Sittampalam |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |